Back

Unseen Insights: An AI-Powered Exploration of Secure Patient Messages in Ophthalmology

Kim, J. Y.; Fazal, Z. Z.; Wang, S. Y.; Chang, R. T.; Linos, E.; Sepah, Y.

2026-02-05 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345491 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo characterize the clinical and administrative concerns communicated through secure ophthalmology messaging and to assess differences in message content across patient sociodemographic groups. DesignCross-sectional study of de-identified, patient-initiated secure messages sent between June 2014 and July 2024. ParticipantsPatients with ophthalmic conditions who initiated secure electronic health record portal messages. Of 48 516 extracted message threads, 30 390 patient medical advice request messages from 4 817 unique patients were included after exclusion of questionnaires, courtesy messages, and clinician responses. Participants were 55.5% female, 56.9% aged 50 years or older, 48.7% White, and 85.7% non-Hispanic. MethodsNatural language processing and large language model-assisted topic classification were used to categorize message content. Differences in message frequency by demographic subgroup were assessed using 2-proportion z tests. Main Outcomes and MeasuresDistribution of message topics and frequency of clinical concerns stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and marital status. ResultsNearly half of all messages addressed administrative issues, including scheduling, medication refills, and insurance. Among clinical concerns, vision disturbances (20.8%), glaucoma-related symptoms (8.7%), imaging or tumor-related questions (7.5%), and postoperative concerns (7.4%) were most common. Message content differed significantly by demographic characteristics. Non-White patients more frequently raised issues related to pharmacy refills, insurance, glaucoma, and disability documentation, whereas White patients more often reported surgical concerns. Older patients more frequently messaged about glaucoma, surgery, and tumor-related issues, while female patients more often reported complications and swelling or infection. ConclusionsSecure patient messages frequently include clinically relevant symptoms with potential triage implications and demonstrate demographic differences in care-seeking behavior. Systematic analysis of message content may support safer triage, improved workflow efficiency, and more equitable delivery of ophthalmic care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.6%
3
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.2%
5
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
9
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
13
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
15
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
29
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%