Unseen Insights: An AI-Powered Exploration of Secure Patient Messages in Ophthalmology
Kim, J. Y.; Fazal, Z. Z.; Wang, S. Y.; Chang, R. T.; Linos, E.; Sepah, Y.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo characterize the clinical and administrative concerns communicated through secure ophthalmology messaging and to assess differences in message content across patient sociodemographic groups. DesignCross-sectional study of de-identified, patient-initiated secure messages sent between June 2014 and July 2024. ParticipantsPatients with ophthalmic conditions who initiated secure electronic health record portal messages. Of 48 516 extracted message threads, 30 390 patient medical advice request messages from 4 817 unique patients were included after exclusion of questionnaires, courtesy messages, and clinician responses. Participants were 55.5% female, 56.9% aged 50 years or older, 48.7% White, and 85.7% non-Hispanic. MethodsNatural language processing and large language model-assisted topic classification were used to categorize message content. Differences in message frequency by demographic subgroup were assessed using 2-proportion z tests. Main Outcomes and MeasuresDistribution of message topics and frequency of clinical concerns stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and marital status. ResultsNearly half of all messages addressed administrative issues, including scheduling, medication refills, and insurance. Among clinical concerns, vision disturbances (20.8%), glaucoma-related symptoms (8.7%), imaging or tumor-related questions (7.5%), and postoperative concerns (7.4%) were most common. Message content differed significantly by demographic characteristics. Non-White patients more frequently raised issues related to pharmacy refills, insurance, glaucoma, and disability documentation, whereas White patients more often reported surgical concerns. Older patients more frequently messaged about glaucoma, surgery, and tumor-related issues, while female patients more often reported complications and swelling or infection. ConclusionsSecure patient messages frequently include clinically relevant symptoms with potential triage implications and demonstrate demographic differences in care-seeking behavior. Systematic analysis of message content may support safer triage, improved workflow efficiency, and more equitable delivery of ophthalmic care.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence's Contribution to Biomedical Literature Search: Revolutionizing or Complicating? 92%
- Socioeconomic and demographic patterning of family uptake of a paediatric electronic patient portal innovation 92%
- An Inherently Interpretable AI model improves Screening Speed and Accuracy for Early Diabetic Retinopathy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Eye-tracking for a Decision Support Application 91%
- Long COVID symptoms from Reddit: Characterizing post-COVID syndrome from patient reports 91%
- MMFP-Tableau: Enabling Precision Mitochondrial Medicine through Integration, Visualization, and Analytics of Clinical and Research Health System Electronic Data 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 91%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 91%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.