Back

Assessing COVID-19 Risk Factors in Toronto Using a Localized Spatio-Temporal Conditional Autoregressive Model

Amoako, A. A.; Ge, E.; Tuite, A.; Carabali, M.; Fisman, D.

2026-02-04 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345488 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeMost spatio-temporal models identify COVID-19 sociodemographic and socioeconomic risk factors using methods that assume a single spatial dependency pattern across the city, which may not reflect reality. The purpose of this study is to apply a spatially and temporally localized Bayesian model to identify COVID-19 risk factors that account for localized context. MethodsFor this study, a spatio-temporal localized Bayesian Hierarchical Model (ST-LCAR) was used to assess the relationships between population factors (age, sex, income, visible minority status, and education) and COVID-19 relative risk. The ST-LCAR model accounts for spatial and temporal autocorrelation through spatio-temporal random effects along with piecewise intercepts to capture step changes in relative risk patterns that might be reflective of underlying local contexts. This study focuses on the first four complete waves of the COVID-19 pandemic across Forward Sortation Areas (FSAs) in the City of Toronto. ResultsA 10-percentage-point increase in the proportion of residents who identify as visible minorities was associated with a 3% increase in COVID-19 relative risk; however, this association varied across different social contexts. On the other hand, a 10-percentage-point increase in the proportion of residents with post-secondary education was associated with a 22% decrease in relative risk. Beyond quantitative relationships, our model identified 3 times higher COVID-19 relative risk in the northwestern portion of the city, with patterns varying over time. ConclusionThe different COVID-19 patterns in the city of Toronto may have been shaped by the complex and diverse social contexts, products of ingrained systems of structural inequities that influence the living, working, and economic conditions of city residents. Public health interventions and pandemic preparedness should integrate an equity-focused lens that considers the diverse social contexts across the city and how it shapes health outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.5%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.3%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
4
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
10
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
21
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%