Measuring Population Health Dynamics and Health Care Costs in Medicaid Managed Care Using CareMaps
Mehran, R. J.; Kuriyan, J.
Show abstract
ImportancePrevention-focused health policy requires analytic frameworks capable of detecting changes in population health and associated costs within policy-relevant time horizons, particularly in managed care systems where premiums reflect actuarial risk rather than realized medical expenditures. ObjectiveTo evaluate a healthstate-based analytic framework (CareMaps) for measuring population health dynamics, disease progression, and associated costs using longitudinal Medicaid managed care claims data. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective longitudinal analysis of deidentified Medicaid managed care claims in New Mexico from 2011 through 2014. The study included individuals aged 0 to 64 years enrolled in managed care plans. ExposuresChronic disease burden categorized into mutually exclusive, ordered healthstates based on the number of chronic conditions. Main Outcomes and MeasuresCounty- and managed care organization (MCO) level prevalence of healthstates, transition rates between healthstates, and healthstate-specific cost estimates derived from capitation premiums and medical loss ratio defined medical expenditures. ResultsThe CareMaps framework identified specific geographic and MCO level variation in chronic disease prevalence, healthstate transition rates, and per-member spending patterns that were not fully explained by actuarial risk adjustment. Transitions from nonchronic to chronic healthstates varied markedly across counties, indicating heterogeneity in disease progression and prevention related outcomes. Conclusions and RelevanceA healthstate based analytic framework applied to longitudinal Medicaid managed care data enables standardized measurement of population health dynamics and associated costs within policy relevant time horizons. Such approaches may support evaluation of preventive care performance, inform risk adjustment, and enhance public-sector oversight of managed care programs.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel decision modeling framework for health policy analyses when outcomes are influenced by social and disease processes 92%
- Forecasting local surges in COVID-19 hospitalizations through adaptive decision tree classifiers 90%
- Bias-adjusted predictions of county-level vaccination coverage from the COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 91%
- Balancing revenue generation with capacity generation: Case distribution, financial impact and hospital capacity changes from cancelling or resuming elective surgeries in the US during COVID-19 89%
- Urban-Rural Disparities in Spatio-Temporal Accessibility of Pharmacy Care: A Case Study of Vermont, USA 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- County-Level Estimates of Excess Mortality associated with COVID-19 in the United States 90%
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
- Life Expectancy and Voting Patterns in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.