Back

Selectively Augmented Decision Tree for Explainable Dementia Detection

Kamalov, F.; Thabtah, F.; Peebles, D.; Ibrahim, A.

2026-02-04 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345441
Show abstract

Timely and accurate diagnosis of dementia remains a critical yet challenging task. Although machine learning (ML) techniques have shown considerable promise in dementia detection, their inherent complexity often results in opaque, "black-box" models that limit clinical acceptance and usability. In this paper, we propose a Selectively Augmented Decision Tree (SADT), an interpretable AI model specifically designed for dementia detection. SADT incorporates a structured three-phase pipeline consisting of feature selection, data balancing, and construction of a transparent decision tree classifier. We apply SADT to the OASIS dataset and evaluate it empirically, showing that SADT outperforms traditional ML benchmarks, validating its effectiveness. In addition to its superior performance, SADT also mirrors aspects of human decision-making in its sequential, rule-based prioritization of key features. This approach aligns with cognitive models of cue use and heuristic reasoning, making it not only clinically transparent but also psychologically aligned with how diagnostic decisions are often made in practice. SADTs strong predictive performance and interpretability grounded in human reasoning facilitates explanation and human scrutiny, and has the potential to improve both clinical decision-making and trust in AI-assisted diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 0.7%
16.2%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 10%
11.8%
3
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 1%
8.0%
4
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 2%
4.9%
5
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 2%
4.7%
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
based on 18 papers
Top 0.6%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 3%
2.6%
11
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
2.6%
12
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 82%
2.6%
13
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Patterns
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
1.7%
18
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
based on 31 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
20
International Journal of Medical Informatics
based on 25 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
21
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 39%
0.8%
23
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
based on 31 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
25
NeuroImage: Clinical
based on 77 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
28
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 8%
0.7%