Back

Designing for Success: A Prospective Evaluation of Implementation Factors Affecting a Prototype Novel Medical Device in a Low-Resource Environment Using the CFIR 2.0

Morecroft, M.; Byambabayar, U.; DeMello, N.; Saarinen, A.; Rees, E.

2026-03-02 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.02.03.26345034 medRxiv
Show abstract

1BackgroundImplementation challenges are a major contributor to the failure of novel medical technologies in low-resource settings. Although frameworks such as the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) are widely used to evaluate interventions post-implementation, their prospective application during the product development phase remains limited. MethodsThis study aimed to prospectively assess implementation factors relevant to the future adoption of a prototype handheld ultrasound device designed to improve congenital heart disease (CHD) screening in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Structured observational field notes were collected during a clinical site visit to Mongolia in May 2024. Observations were made across five hospitals and two high-level stakeholder meetings. Data were thematically analysed using Braun and Clarkes reflexive method, followed by deductive mapping to CFIR 2.0 domains. ResultsThe final codebook included 70 codes mapped to four CFIR 2.0 domains: Innovation, Individuals, Inner Setting, and Outer Setting. Key facilitators included high staff motivation, alignment of hospital and national goals with device priorities, and the devices simplified screening procedure and cloud-based data transfer capability. Identified barriers included inconsistent infrastructure across hospitals, limited access to trained staff, lack of maintenance systems, and fragmented digital health records. ConclusionsProspective application of CFIR 2.0 provided a systematic method for identifying factors likely to influence implementation success. This study demonstrates the value of incorporating implementation science early in device development, particularly in LMIC contexts where design-stage decisions can determine device success. By embedding structured implementation analysis into product development, developers may improve alignment between design and setting, reduce downstream failures, and accelerate adoption of new technologies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.