Back

Automated Ventricle Assessment via Three-dimensional Anatomical Reconstruction (AVA-TAR): a computational toolkit for autonomous lateral ventricle assessment in preclinical hydrocephalus models

Chakladar, S.; Pan, S.; Limbrick, O.; Pandey, M.; Halupnik, G. L.; Zhao, A.; Mahjoub, M. R.; Quirk, J. D.; Nazeri, A.; Strahle, J. M.

2026-02-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.02.703412 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCurrent workflows for studying hydrocephalus in rodent models rely on manual segmentation or qualitative assessment of ventricular size on small animal magnetic resonance imaging, which are both inefficient and prone to variability. Atlas-based methods enable more streamlined segmentation, but their analysis is limited to morphologically normal samples. ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop and internally validate a deep learning model that performs automated segmentation of lateral ventricles in rodent brain MRIs, allowing for 3D ventricle reconstruction, morphological analysis, and ventriculomegaly detection. MethodsFour U-Net++ neural networks, each with different encoder backbones, were trained using 307 rodent brain MRIs (262 rats, 45 mice), each with manually segmented lateral ventricles serving as the ground truth. Model performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient, intersection over union (IoU), and Hausdorff index. The most optimal model was evaluated further for its ability to quantify ventricle volume, convexity, surface area, and symmetry. ResultsThe U-Net++ model with an EfficientNet-B1 encoder achieved high accuracy (Dice: 0.823 {+/-} 0.136; IoU: 0.721 {+/-} 0.85). Further assessment of its morphological predictions found strong correlations with manual measurements of ventricular morphology, with Pearson and interclass correlation coefficients exceeding 0.96 across all metrics. The full validated pipeline was packaged into a publicly available application, hosted at https://ava-tar.org. ConclusionThis study introduces a deep learning tool for automated segmentation and morphological analysis of lateral ventricles in rodent MRIs. The tools efficiency and accuracy in quantifying ventricle morphology offers significant utility in preclinical hydrocephalus research with potential future application in the clinical setting.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.3%
2
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
5
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
11
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
15
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
22
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%