Back

Effective Implementation of Medicines Shortage Policy: Evidence from Australias Serious Scarcity Substitution Instruments

Janetzki, J.; Kalisch Ellett, L.; Pratt, N.; Kemp-Casey, A.

2026-02-04 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.02.26345406
Show abstract

BackgroundMedication shortages are a considerable and ongoing issue in healthcare, disrupting consumer access. Since 2021, Australias national medicines regulator has issued Serious Scarcity Substitution Instruments (SSSIs), allowing pharmacists to substitute a specific therapeutically equivalent strength and/or formulation of a medicine without prior approval from a prescriber. The impact of SSSIs on utilisation of medicines has not been investigated. ObjectiveDetermine whether SSSIs are effective in addressing medicine shortages and meeting patient need. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used aggregated pharmacy claims to examine the utilisation of 12 medicines which had an SSSI. We calculated the percentage change in defined daily doses dispensed per 1000 population per day in the 11 months after SSSI implementation, compared with the previous two years. A percentage change of less than 20% was used to indicate success. ResultsFollowing product shortages, utilisation fell for 10 of the 12 medicines examined. For eight of these medicines (amoxicillin, cefalexin, estradiol, fluoxetine, insulin degludec with insulin aspart, isosorbide mononitrate, vigabatrin, and warfarin) decreases in utilisation were minimised to <20%. On average, SSSIs where all permitted substitute products were scarce (e.g. abatacept) were associated with larger decreases in use (between -22% and -68%) than those for which none or only some of the substitutes were in shortage (between -45% and +7%, respectively). ConclusionsWhile product shortages led to decreases in medicines consumption, SSSIs appeared to be successful in limiting decreases. However, SSSIs were less likely to be successful when many of the permitted substitute products were also scarce. Key pointsO_LIThis study is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of Australias Serious Scarcity Substitution Instruments (SSSIs) in mitigating medicine shortages using national dispensing data and interrupted time series analysis. C_LIO_LITwo-thirds of SSSIs successfully limited utilisation declines to less than 20%, with effectiveness strongly linked to the availability of substitute products. C_LIO_LIBy demonstrating variable utilisation outcomes across medicines, this study adds empirical evidence to international debates on substitution policies, suggesting that nationally standardised frameworks like Australias SSSIs may function best when supported by robust supply intelligence. C_LIO_LISSSIs are a valuable policy tool for maintaining continuity of care during shortages, but timely implementation and ensuring substitute supply are critical for optimal impact. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 7%
13.5%
2
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 0.2%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 49%
10.3%
4
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 0.4%
5.4%
5
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 0.2%
2.9%
6
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 4%
2.9%
7
Wellcome Open Research
based on 34 papers
Top 0.9%
2.4%
8
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
based on 29 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
10
The Lancet Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 0.7%
1.3%
11
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 17%
1.3%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 12%
1.3%
14
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 18%
1.3%
15
BMJ Global Health
based on 95 papers
Top 10%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Addiction
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
18
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
19
BMJ Mental Health
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BJGP Open
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
based on 32 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Journal of the International AIDS Society
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 44%
0.7%
25
Sexually Transmitted Infections
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 28%
0.7%