Effective Implementation of Medicines Shortage Policy: Evidence from Australias Serious Scarcity Substitution Instruments
Janetzki, J.; Kalisch Ellett, L.; Pratt, N.; Kemp-Casey, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundMedication shortages are a considerable and ongoing issue in healthcare, disrupting consumer access. Since 2021, Australias national medicines regulator has issued Serious Scarcity Substitution Instruments (SSSIs), allowing pharmacists to substitute a specific therapeutically equivalent strength and/or formulation of a medicine without prior approval from a prescriber. The impact of SSSIs on utilisation of medicines has not been investigated. ObjectiveDetermine whether SSSIs are effective in addressing medicine shortages and meeting patient need. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used aggregated pharmacy claims to examine the utilisation of 12 medicines which had an SSSI. We calculated the percentage change in defined daily doses dispensed per 1000 population per day in the 11 months after SSSI implementation, compared with the previous two years. A percentage change of less than 20% was used to indicate success. ResultsFollowing product shortages, utilisation fell for 10 of the 12 medicines examined. For eight of these medicines (amoxicillin, cefalexin, estradiol, fluoxetine, insulin degludec with insulin aspart, isosorbide mononitrate, vigabatrin, and warfarin) decreases in utilisation were minimised to <20%. On average, SSSIs where all permitted substitute products were scarce (e.g. abatacept) were associated with larger decreases in use (between -22% and -68%) than those for which none or only some of the substitutes were in shortage (between -45% and +7%, respectively). ConclusionsWhile product shortages led to decreases in medicines consumption, SSSIs appeared to be successful in limiting decreases. However, SSSIs were less likely to be successful when many of the permitted substitute products were also scarce. Key pointsO_LIThis study is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of Australias Serious Scarcity Substitution Instruments (SSSIs) in mitigating medicine shortages using national dispensing data and interrupted time series analysis. C_LIO_LITwo-thirds of SSSIs successfully limited utilisation declines to less than 20%, with effectiveness strongly linked to the availability of substitute products. C_LIO_LIBy demonstrating variable utilisation outcomes across medicines, this study adds empirical evidence to international debates on substitution policies, suggesting that nationally standardised frameworks like Australias SSSIs may function best when supported by robust supply intelligence. C_LIO_LISSSIs are a valuable policy tool for maintaining continuity of care during shortages, but timely implementation and ensuring substitute supply are critical for optimal impact. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 94%
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 93%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of knowledge and perception of prescribers towards rational medicine use in the Ashanti Region of Ghana 95%
- Beyond social prescribing - the use of social return on investment (SROI) analysis in integrated health and social care interventions in England and Wales: a protocol for a systematic review 94%
- Non-medical prescribing policy in the United Kingdom National Health Service: systematic review and narrative synthesis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Medicines Intelligence Data Platform: A population-based data resource from New South Wales, Australia 91%
- Medication, Vaccine, and Folic Acid Use Among Pregnant Women in Belgium: Insights from the BELpREG Cohort 90%
- INSIGHT: A Tool for Fit-for-Purpose Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Observational Data Sources for Real World Evidence on Medicine and Vaccine Safety 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sales of over-the-counter products containing codeine in 31 countries, 2013-2019: a retrospective observational study 93%
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Antihypertensive Medication Change: A Quantitative Study Using Social Media 93%
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 96%
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 93%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.