Normal Variability of Urinary Markers in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury and Disease Using Intermittent Catheterization
Tractenberg, R. E.; Groah, S. L.; Newcomb, E.; Riegner, C. R.; Forster, C. S.
Show abstract
Accurate diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in individuals with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) due to spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) remains a major clinical challenge. Standard diagnostic tools--including urine dipstick, urinalysis, and culture--lack population-specific reference ranges, and existing criteria are often insufficient to distinguish infection from background variability. To address this gap, we conducted a longitudinal study to define the range of "normal" variability in common urinary biomarkers among individuals with SCI/D who manage their bladders using intermittent catheterization (IC). Participants with NLUTD due to SCI/D who manage their bladders with IC provided urine samples at least two weeks apart, while asymptomatic. We assessed urinary white blood cell count, nitrite, leukocyte esterase, culture-based findings, and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) to characterize intra-individual stability and inter-individual variation in biomarker profiles. Findings demonstrate that urine parameters exhibit measurable but bounded variability in the absence of UTI, and that deviations beyond these thresholds may support more accurate and individualized UTI diagnosis. By defining the normal range within which values vary without the emergence of symptoms, we hope to further inform clinical and researcher decision-making around variability that moves an individual beyond their normal range of variation in these urinary markers. Operationalizing biologic variability can reduce diagnostic uncertainty and improve antimicrobial stewardship in this frequently overtreated population.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world evidence: telemedicine for complicated cases of urinary tract infection 94%
- Prospective Analysis of urINe LAM to Eliminate NTM Sputum Screening (PAINLESS) study: Rationale and trial design for testing urine lipoarabinomannan as a marker of NTM lung infection in cystic fibrosis 91%
- Dynamic analysis of the individual patterns of intakes, voids, and bladder sensations reported in bladder diaries collected in the LURN study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Urinalysis, but not blood biochemistry, detects the early renal-impairment in patients with COVID-19 91%
- Factors influencing plasma galectin-3 concentrations in catheter-bearing hospitalized patients 91%
- A new method for improving extraction efficiency and purity of urine and plasma cell-free DNA 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic Efficacy of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2: The COVid-19 AntiGen (COVAG) study 89%
- Performance of a point of care test for detecting IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and seroprevalence in blood donors and health care workers in Panama 88%
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Myofascial Frequency Syndrome: A novel syndrome of bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms associated with myofascial pelvic floor dysfunction 93%
- AKI Risk Score (AKI-RiSc): Developing an Interpretable Clinical Score for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department 90%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Propidium Monoazide-Based PCR Assay Can Measure Viable Uropathogenic E. coli in Vitro and in Vivo 93%
- Updating urinary microbiome analyses to enhance biologic interpretation 90%
- Microbiota compositions from infertile couples seeking in vitro fertilization (IVF), using 16S rRNA gene sequencing methods: any correlation to clinical outcomes? 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.