Back

Programmed Manipulation of RNA Targets By Human Argonaute 2

Lusi, R. F.; Moncayo von Hase, S.; Model, C.; Banik, S. M.

2026-02-02 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.02.01.703109 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nucleic acid manipulation using programmable ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) has enabled transformative research tools and led to new therapeutic strategies. RNA directly regulates diverse cellular processes,1 is a crucial mediator of protein synthesis, and offers advantages in therapeutic targeting and fundamental discovery complementary to those of DNA.2 ISC-3 and Cas-based4,5 scaffolds where the RNP is fused to an effector protein can alter RNA sequence, structure, and function. However, the non-human origins underlying these systems create challenges in therapeutic translation and the presence of non-native proteins can have unintended and little understood effects on cells.6-8 Systematic repurposing of human proteins, which have been optimized in the cellular environment by evolution, for expanded programmable functions could reveal new biological principles and bypass the limitations of foreign proteins. Here, we demonstrate that the catalytic engine of the RNA-interference (RNAi) pathway, human Argonaute 2 (AGO2),9,10 can be repurposed as a modular targeting domain, and when fused to a C-to-U deaminase, enable AGO-Led Targeted Editing of RNA (ALTER). Using guide RNAs which remodel target RNA structure for selective editing and reduced nuclease activity, we show that ALTER can act on a variety of target transcripts including endogenous mRNAs and lncRNAs, with activities comparable or exceeding those of Cas-based systems.11,12 Despite its human origin and role in RNAi, transcriptome-wide RNAseq revealed lower levels of off-target editing compared to Cas-based editing systems. These results demonstrate that AGO2 can be rationally redirected from RNAi to a broader spectrum of RNA manipulations, establishing that intact human proteins can be reconfigured for expanded molecular function.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
4
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.6%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
9
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
10
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.3%
12
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
15
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
19
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
21
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%
25
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%