Back

Mixture Models Unveil the Origin of the Enigmatic Satyrine Butterfly Genera Calisto and Llorenteana (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae).

Nunez, R.; Bodenheim, A.; Alvarez, Y.; Wahlberg, N.; Espeland, M.

2026-02-03 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.01.703087 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We provide the first comprehensive analysis of the origin of two enigmatic Satyrinae genera of uncertain affinities. Calisto, the only Satyrinae genus from the West Indies and endemic to these islands, has resisted numerous attempts at phylogenetic placement, regardless of the data type or methods used. Llorenteana, a monotypic genus from northwestern Mexico, has never been included in a molecular phylogenetic study, and past authors have placed it in five different genera and subtribes. We used mostly published genomic data, but also newly sequenced whole genome data from museum specimens and old DNA extracts, extracted BUSCO genes and prepared several datasets. These datasets differed in the degree of heterogeneity and saturation, the number of nucleotide positions used (all positions or only the first two), and were analyzed as nucleotides or as amino acids. We employed several methods for phylogenetic reconstruction using both partitioned and mixture models, as well as ASTRAL, and we inferred divergence times and ancestral areas of origin for Calisto and Llorenteana. The phylogenetic placement of Calisto varied among datasets when we used partitioned models and ASTRAL; however, most datasets resulted in the same relationships under mixture models. Our results suggest that Calisto is part of a clade of Old World origin that colonized the New World from north to south, thus sharing ancestry with Nearctic taxa. Llorenteana constitutes one of the earliest splits within the Euptychiina, a subtribe of Neotropical origin, but descending together with the Pronophilina from Nearctic ancestors. We propose the recognition of Erebiina stat. rev. as the only subtribe comprising the former Calistina syn. nov., Callerebiina syn. nov, Maniolina syn. nov., and Ypthimina syn. nov.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.7%
2
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
5
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.9%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
9
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
19
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
21
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
22
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%