Back

An Integrative Phylogenomic Framework Quantifies the Dominant Role of Introgression in Phylogenetic Discordance among Diploid Oryza Species

Li, H.-F.; Dai, S.-f.; Fang, T.-L.; Gao, L.-Z.

2026-02-03 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.01.702050 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPhylogenomic studies frequently reveal widespread gene tree discordance, primarily arising from incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and hybridization and/or introgression. Disentangling these processes is especially challenging in rapidly radiating lineages. The genus Oryza, with its rapid diversification and multiple genome types, exemplifies this pervasive phylogenetic incongruence. We integrated multiple genomic datasets including whole-genome resequencing, transcriptomes, and published genomes from diploid Oryza species. Concatenation and multispecies coalescent analyses recovered a robust, congruent species tree, placing the FF and GG genome groups as a monophyletic basal clade, followed by successive divergence of the EE, CC, BB, and AA lineages, a topology differing from some prior hypotheses. ResultsTo assess the sources of discordance, we employed a suite of complementary phylogenomic methods. Quantifying introgression via Branch Lengths (QuIBL)-based model comparisons suggested that [~]74.17% of gene tree-species tree discordance is better explained by post-speciation introgression, whereas only [~]15.56% is consistent with ILS alone. Phylogenetic networks (PhyloNet) and allele-sharing statistics (D-statistics, f-branch) corroborated these results, indicating widespread historical introgression both within and between genome groups. Furthermore, genome-wide scans using the fdM statistic localized introgressed genomic regions, which showed reduced interspecific divergence and were enriched for genes involved in stress responses and metabolism. ConclusionsTaken together, our results demonstrate that historical introgression, not ILS, is the dominant force shaping phylogenetic discordance in diploid Oryza. The integrative phylogenomic framework implemented here, which quantifies the contributions of introgression versus ILS and maps the genomic footprint of gene flow, provides a replicable strategy for resolving complex evolutionary histories in other rapidly radiating lineages.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.6%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
3
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
5
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.0%
8
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
11
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
13
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
14
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
18
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
21
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
30
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%