Back

Developing Evidence-Based Criteria for Oxycodone Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Protocol for the OxyGuidED Study Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method

ALTHAGAFI, S. M.; Keogh, S. M.; Hughes, J.

2026-02-03 pain medicine
10.64898/2026.02.01.26345327
Show abstract

BackgroundOxycodone is widely prescribed for managing acute pain in emergency departments (ED), but the appropriateness of this prescription is not fully established. Although concerns about opioid misuse and dependence drive efforts to reduce inappropriate prescribing, there is increasing recognition of the importance of adequate pain management. Therefore, it is essential to develop appropriate prescribing criteria that balance the risks and benefits of opioids, ensuring their benefits are maximised while minimising potential harm. ObjectiveFollowing the recommended format for a research protocol paper, this protocol describes the process and methods used to develop evidence-based criteria for oxycodone prescribing in the ED, informed by scientific evidence and expert clinical judgment, using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. MethodThe process will be carried out in sequential stages. First, scope and key terms will be defined, and then a targeted literature review will be conducted to synthesise available evidence. Subsequently, based on this synthesis and the investigator teams clinical insights, clinical scenarios will be developed in collaboration with field experts. A multidisciplinary panel comprising specialists in emergency medicine, emergency nurses, and pharmacists will evaluate these scenarios in two rounds. Each scenario will be rated on a 1-9 scale, where 1 indicates that harm outweighs benefit and 9 indicates that benefit outweighs harm. The median rating score will fall between 1 and 9, where 1-3 without disagreement is inappropriate, 4-6 without disagreement is uncertain, and 7-9 without disagreement is appropriate. Disagreement is defined as at least three experts scoring in both extremes. Final scenario ratings will be presented according to their assessed appropriateness and used to inform appropriateness criteria for prescribing oxycodone in the adult ED. ConclussionThe RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method offers a systematic and evidence-informed framework for developing prescribing criteria to support the appropriate use of oxycodone in adult ED.

Matching journals

1
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 3%
5.7× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 20%
18.7%
3
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
#1
142× avg
4
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
#1
84× avg
5
Pain
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.4%
58× avg
6
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.5%
35× avg
7
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
37× avg
8
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 48%
3.1%
9
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.7%
32× avg
10
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.8%
19× avg
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 10%
2.1× avg
12
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.9%
12× avg
13
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 8%
2.7× avg
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
21× avg
15
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
9.6× avg
16
Addiction
Wiley · based on 24 published papers
Top 2%
5.4× avg
17
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 5%
4.3× avg
18
PeerJ
PeerJ · based on 46 published papers
Top 11%
2.2× avg