Back

Extending the OMOP Common Data Model to Support Observational Peripheral Vascular Disease Research

Leese, P. J.; McIntee, T.; Browder, S. E.; Laivuori, M.; Alabi, O.; McGinigle, K. L.

2026-02-03 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.01.26345276 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPeripheral artery disease (PAD) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) cause substantial morbidity and mortality, yet research progress is limited by fragmented, non-standardized data. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) provides a standardized framework for electronic health record (EHR) research but lacks domain-specific detail for peripheral vascular diseases. This study aimed to develop and test a vascular-specific OMOP CDM extension to improve data standardization, enable reproducible real-world analyses, and support precision medicine research in PAD and CLTI. MethodsWe identified patients with PAD, CLTI, or diabetic foot ulcers who sought care within the UNC Health System between April 2014 and July 2024. Standard OMOP tables were supplemented with peripheral vascular laboratory (PVL) data and state death records. Intermediate tables were designed for key clinical domains (e.g., smoking, comorbidities, revascularizations) to enhance reusability. Predictive models for revascularization and mortality were developed using logistic regression with Bayesian weighting and Markov Chain Monte Carlo feature selection. Clinical ApplicationThe revascularization model displayed high performance with and without important vascular variables (AUC = 0.970 and AUC 0.969, respectively), while the mortality model demonstrated moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.656) that improved with inclusion of vascular-specific features (AUC = 0.752). ConclusionsThis vascular OMOP extension represents one of the first specialty-specific frameworks for peripheral vascular research. By extending the OMOP CDM to a vascular domain, this work advances both the technical framework and scientific capability of real-world data research in limb preservation and precision vascular medicine.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.