Back

Extending the OMOP Common Data Model to Support Observational Peripheral Vascular Disease Research

Leese, P. J.; McIntee, T.; Browder, S. E.; Laivuori, M.; Alabi, O.; McGinigle, K. L.

2026-02-03 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.01.26345276 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPeripheral artery disease (PAD) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) cause substantial morbidity and mortality, yet research progress is limited by fragmented, non-standardized data. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) provides a standardized framework for electronic health record (EHR) research but lacks domain-specific detail for peripheral vascular diseases. This study aimed to develop and test a vascular-specific OMOP CDM extension to improve data standardization, enable reproducible real-world analyses, and support precision medicine research in PAD and CLTI. MethodsWe identified patients with PAD, CLTI, or diabetic foot ulcers who sought care within the UNC Health System between April 2014 and July 2024. Standard OMOP tables were supplemented with peripheral vascular laboratory (PVL) data and state death records. Intermediate tables were designed for key clinical domains (e.g., smoking, comorbidities, revascularizations) to enhance reusability. Predictive models for revascularization and mortality were developed using logistic regression with Bayesian weighting and Markov Chain Monte Carlo feature selection. Clinical ApplicationThe revascularization model displayed high performance with and without important vascular variables (AUC = 0.970 and AUC 0.969, respectively), while the mortality model demonstrated moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.656) that improved with inclusion of vascular-specific features (AUC = 0.752). ConclusionsThis vascular OMOP extension represents one of the first specialty-specific frameworks for peripheral vascular research. By extending the OMOP CDM to a vascular domain, this work advances both the technical framework and scientific capability of real-world data research in limb preservation and precision vascular medicine.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.0%
3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
4
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.2%
6
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.5%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
19
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%