Back

A Quality Measure for Repeating Multiple-Unit Spike Patterns

Palm, G.; Paoletti, M.; Ito, J.; Stella, A.; Grün, S.

2026-02-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.31.702754 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We propose a quality measure for spatio-temporal spike patterns (STPs) in multiple-neuron recordings. In such recordings, repeating STPs or pattern repetitions (PRs) are often found, with many of these generated by chance. To rule those out, statistical tests have been developed to discriminate the unlikely from the more likely PRs. This statistical problem is complicated by the fact that there are several obvious quality criteria for a PR, such as the size (the number of spikes) of the pattern and the number of its occurrences. Here, we propose a canonical way of combining several criteria (which we collect in the so-called signature of the pattern) into a single quality measure, based on the unlikeliness of the pattern. This measure is defined mathematically, and a formula for its computation is derived for stationary spike trains. It can be used to compare PRs. Since spike trains are not stationary in practice, we discuss, for two experimental data sets, how well the stationary formula correlates with the defined quality measure as determined from simulations. The results encourage the use of the stationary formula or also some simpler, related formulas as proxies for the quality, for the comparison of PRs and also for statistical tests that avoid the multiple testing problem incurred by using several quality criteria. Based on our results, we propose a few test statistics, i.e., random variables on the space of multi-unit spike trains with an appropriate null-hypothesis distribution, to evaluate STPs with less computational and sampling efforts.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.4%
2
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.5%
4
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
13
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
22
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%