Back

The impact of crystallographic plane orientation as an unexplored terrain in hemocompatible material design

Parlak, Z. V.; Labude-Weber, N.; Krause, A.; Neuhaus, K.; Schmidt, C.; Mueller, L.; Radermacher, C.; Ruetten, S.; Henss, A.; Ferraris, S.; Spriano, S.; Neuss, S.; Gonzalez-Julian, J.; Schickle, K.

2026-02-02 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.30.702901 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Thrombogenicity causes significant complications in the application of blood-contacting implants, requiring strategies to prevent adverse coagulation reactions. The thrombotic responses to the foreign surfaces are mainly driven by surficial factors such as surface energy, topography, and electrochemical interactions. Although anticoagulation therapies reduce the risks of clotting, patients might still encounter bleeding complications. Therefore, rather than high-risk anticoagulation therapies to counteract coagulation, it is essential to ensure hemocompatibility through the materials intrinsic properties. Endothelialization is crucial in preventing thrombotic complications, with various strategies explored for facilitating endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation. We investigated the impact of crystallographic anisotropy on endothelial and blood cell interactions on four main planes (A-, C-, M-, and R-planes) of single crystalline alumina (-Al2O3, sapphire). Employing advanced surface characterization techniques, including SIMS, KPFM and Zeta potential measurements, our study sheds light on the hemocompatibility of biomaterials considering anisotropic effects. We elucidated that the A-plane of alumina promotes endothelialization and suppresses platelet activation in contrast to other crystallographic planes. Our investigation into cell-surface interactions provides valuable insights and contributes to the advanced biomaterial design, ultimately leading to enhanced clinical outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
4
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
6
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%