Back

Molecular phylogenetics of Neotropical chrysomeline beetles: Evidence for a constrained history of host plant use

Dury, G. J.; Windsor, D. M.; Sharanowski, B. J.; Sekerka, L.; Bede, J. C.

2026-02-02 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.30.702876 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThis study reconstructs the phylogeny of an expansive set of Neotropical leaf beetles in the subfamily Chrysomelinae. From 33 species in the genus Platyphora Gistel, and an additional 37 species representing 16 beetle genera, five genes, three nuclear, and two mitochondrial, were sequenced and used to obtain a well-supported molecular phylogeny using both Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood. The subtribes Chrysomelina and Doryphorina (sensu Daccordi 1982) were monophyletic, while the genus Platyphora was polyphyletic. The genus Leptinotarsa Chevrolat is confirmed to be distinct from Stilodes Chevrolat. Host plant family was recorded for both adults and larvae using direct observations where possible. Ancestral host plant use was reconstructed using Bayesian trait analyses. A complicated history of host plant switches among a restricted set of plant families is revealed: In the paraphyletic Platyphora, one clade that includes Proseicela and Leptinotarsa had two switches from Asclepiadiodeae to Solanaceae, one switch to Moraceae, and one switch to Malpighiaceae, another Platyphora clade had switches between Asteraceae and Rauvolfioideae, and from Rauvolfioideae to Asclepiadiodeae, with other members of the same clade feeding on Boraginaceae and Convolvulaceae. All species included in the clade containing Tritaenia and Stilodes fed on Malpighiaceae, and all species included in the Cosmogramma and Calligrapha clade fed on Malvaceae.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
5
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.6%
7
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
14
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
21
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
24
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%