Batch correction for large-scale mass spectrometry imaging experiments
Thomsen, A. A.; Jensen, O. N.
Show abstract
We assess batch correction methods for MALDI mass spectrometry imaging experiments. ComBAT reduced batch-related technical variance, maintained biological variation, and improved the overall score by 19.4%. Availability and implementationMethods are available in R. comBAT is used through the "sva" package while Harmony, CCA, FastMNN are available in the "Seurat" package https://github.com/satijalab/seurat. scVI, scANVI are Scanorama are available in the Python programming language and through github: https://github.com/scverse/scvi-tools.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extremely fast and accurate open modification spectral library searching of high-resolution mass spectra using feature hashing and graphics processing units 97%
- Isobaric matching between runs and novel PSM-level normalization in MaxQuant strongly improve reporter ion-based quantification 96%
- nf-encyclopedia: A cloud-ready pipeline for chromatogram library data-independent acquisition proteomics workflows 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mistle: bringing spectral library predictions to metaproteomics with an efficient search index 96%
- Preserving Full Spectrum Information in ImagingMass Spectrometry Data Reduction 95%
- AlphaMap: An open-source Python package for the visual annotation of proteomics data with sequence specific knowledge 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning on Multimodal Chemical and Whole Slide Imaging Data for Predicting Prostate Cancer Directly from Tissue Images 96%
- MealTime-MS: A Machine Learning-Guided Real-Time Mass SpectrometryAnalysis for Protein Identification and Efficient DynamicExclusion 96%
- Machine learning strategies to tackle data challenges in mass spectrometry-based proteomics 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.