Back

Hydrogel-imposed boundary conditions guide single-lumen neuroepithelial morphogenesis

Huang, M. S.; Roth, J. G.; Kim, D.; Pashin, K. P.; Pizzarella, D.; Yang, T. M.; Liu, Y.; Navarro, R. S.; Palmer, T. D.; Heilshorn, S. C.

2026-02-02 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.30.702717 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) stem cell-based cultures have emerged as promising in vitro model systems for studying human neurodevelopment. Current neural organoid protocols lack well-defined extracellular matrix (ECM) signaling and are limited by the formation of irregular tissue morphologies with multiple organizing centers, in contrast to the single neuroepithelial structure that emerges during embryonic development. This variability limits inter-organoid reproducibility and constrains their utility for modeling early developmental processes. To overcome these limitations, we leverage a materials-based approach to impose dynamic boundary conditions that extrinsically guide the self-organization of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Specifically, we develop a family of hyaluronic acid-elastin-like protein (HELP) hydrogels crosslinked with dynamic covalent bonds that recapitulate key biochemical and biophysical properties of the developing human neural ECM. Within these HELP hydrogels, iPSCs robustly self-organize from a single cell into complex neuroepithelial tissues with a single lumen. By tuning the boundary conditions imposed by the hydrogel, we identify matrix stress relaxation rate and tensional homeostasis as key regulators of single-lumen rosette formation and maintenance. With this hydrogel-enabled system, we identify phenotypic abnormalities in an early neurodevelopmental model of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Ultimately, our tunable engineered hydrogel supports the initiation of single-cell derived 3D neuroepithelial tissues, enables investigation into how matrix-imposed boundary conditions guide developmental morphogenesis, and establishes a reproducible platform for disease modeling.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
14.0%
2
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
4
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
5
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
8
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
9
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
11
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
12
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
13
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
14
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
16
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
19
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%