AI-Enabled Continuous Care Features in Real-World Psychotherapy: Treatment Engagement and Clinical Outcomes
Graupensperger, S.; Brown, M.; Chekroud, A.; Mabe, B.; Kopecky, O.; Srokosz, N.; Hopkins, J.; Hawrilenko, M.
Show abstract
ImportanceAI-enabled features may improve the effectiveness of routine mental health care, yet large-scale real-world evidence remains limited. ObjectiveTo evaluate whether access to AI-enabled continuous care features embedded within routine psychotherapy delivery is associated with improved treatment engagement and clinical outcomes under real-world conditions. DesignPreregistered cluster-level, matched, quasi-experimental study using a real-world rollout of AI-enabled continuous care features compared with psychotherapy alone (intention-to-treat framework). SettingAn employer-sponsored behavioral health program providing outpatient psychotherapy for employees and dependents. ParticipantsAdults initiating a new episode of psychotherapy from 25 employers with access to continuous care features and 75 matched employers without access. Treatment engagement was assessed over 7 weeks (n=26,208), and clinical outcomes were evaluated for up to 180 days (n=5,518). ExposureEmployer-level access to AI-enabled continuous care features supporting engagement and continuity before and between psychotherapy sessions, compared with psychotherapy alone. Main OutcomesEarly treatment engagement (number of psychotherapy sessions attended and time to second session) and changes in depressive and anxiety symptom severity measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). ResultsCompared with matched controls receiving psychotherapy alone, the intervention group attended 5% more psychotherapy sessions during the first 7 weeks (rate ratio, 1.05 [1.01, 1.10]) and completed their second session sooner (mean difference, -0.62 days [-1.05, -0.18]). Both groups demonstrated substantial symptom improvement over time; however, access to continuous care features was associated with additional improvement in depressive symptoms (d=0.16) and anxiety symptoms (d=0.15) at the median duration of care (day 44). These effects translated into clinically meaningful differences in reliable improvement by the median duration of care (NNT=25 for both outcomes). Conclusions and RelevanceIn this real-world evaluation, access to AI-enabled continuous care features embedded within routine psychotherapy delivery was associated with greater early engagement and a higher likelihood of reliable symptom improvement beyond psychotherapy alone. These findings suggest that augmenting routine psychotherapy with AI-enabled continuous care can meaningfully shift recovery trajectories during a standard treatment episode, strengthening early treatment momentum and improving outcomes at scale. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs access to AI-enabled continuous care features embedded within routine psychotherapy delivery associated with improved treatment engagement and clinical outcomes under real-world conditions? FindingsIn this cluster-level, matched, quasi-experimental study of adults receiving psychotherapy within an employer-sponsored behavioral health program, access to AI-enabled continuous care features was associated with significantly greater early treatment engagement and faster improvement in depressive and anxiety symptoms compared with psychotherapy alone. MeaningAI-enabled support features may incrementally enhance the delivery and effectiveness of established psychotherapies when implemented as complements to routine care at scale.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of the Friendship Bench intervention on antiretroviral therapy outcomes and mental health symptoms in rural Zimbabwe: A cluster randomized trial 90%
- Effect of Montelukast vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients with COVID-19: The ACTIV-6 Randomized Clinical Trial 90%
- The associations of child screen time with psychiatric problems: the role of genetic confounding 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial 95%
- The development and validation of a prognostic model to predict relapse in adults with remitted depression in primary care: secondary analysis of pooled individual participant data from multiple studies 94%
- Living alone and mental health: parallel analyses in longitudinal population surveys and electronic health records prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 93%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- General Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire as a marker of low socioeconomic status and inequity 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical benefits of modifying the evening light environment in an acute psychiatric unit: A single-centre, two-arm, parallel-group, pragmatic effectiveness randomised controlled trial 93%
- Mitigating the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions: The B ehavioural A ctivation in S ocial I so l ation (BASIL) pilot randomised controlled trial to prevent depression and loneliness among older people with long term conditions 89%
- Effectiveness of integrated care for older adults with depression and hypertension in rural China: a cluster randomized controlled trial 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.