Racial and ethnic differences in congenital syphilis: mathematical modeling study analyzing the role of prenatal care
Rönn, M. M.; Liang, Y.; Bronsard, M.; Myles, R. L.; Barham, T.; Chesson, H. W.; Miele, K.; Sabety, A.; Molotnikov, L.; Hsu, K.; Gift, T. L.; Salomon, J. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundSyphilis screening and treatment coverage remain lower than recommended among pregnant women in the US. ObjectiveWe estimated the prevalence and incidence of syphilis among pregnant women, incidence of congenital syphilis and the impact of improved prenatal care cascade by race and ethnicity. DesignCompartmental mathematical model of syphilis natural history, prenatal care, and syphilis screening and testing SettingUnited States ParticipantsPregnant women MeasurementsWomen were stratified by race and ethnicity and whether they received any prenatal care. The model was calibrated to epidemiological data for 2019. InterventionsWe evaluated improvements among women with any prenatal care and in all pregnant women, and we examined 100% treatment completion, first-trimester testing, first-trimester testing with 100% treatment, testing twice and testing twice with 100% treatment. ResultsWe estimated that, per 100,000 pregnant women, 110 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 110-120) had syphilis at pregnancy onset, 13 (95% UI 10-15) acquired syphilis during pregnancy, and 13 (95% UI 12-14) had a syphilis-attributable stillbirth (95% UI 12-14). We estimated a 61% (95% UI 60-62) reduction in non-stillbirth-related congenital syphilis outcomes when at least two syphilis tests were provided and treatment was completed among women who receive prenatal care, and a 98% (95%UI 98- 99%) reduction if two tests were provided and treatment was completed for all pregnant women. The largest benefit of expanding testing and treatment to all pregnant women was seen in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations. LimitationsResults represent national averages and do not account regional variation. ConclusionReaching women without prenatal care would substantially reduce congenital syphilis and racial and ethnic differences in congenital syphilis burden. Primary Funding sourceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Projected HIV and Bacterial STI Incidence Following COVID-Related Sexual Distancing and Clinical Service Interruption 92%
- Sexual exposures associated with mpox infection: California, November 2022 to June 2023 91%
- Seroreversion to Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 antigen among young children in a hyperendemic region of Amhara, Ethiopia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge, uptake and intention to use antibiotic post-exposure prophylaxis and meningococcal B vaccine (4CMenB) for gonorrhoea among a large, online community sample of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the UK 88%
- Treatment seeking behaviours, antibiotic use and relationships to multi-drug resistance: A study of urinary tract infection patients in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda 88%
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated risk factors among first antenatal care attendees in Zambia, 2021-2022: a repeated cross-sectional study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in HIV self-testing uptake in Africa: a modeling study of population-based surveys and HIV testing program data 88%
- Cost-effectiveness of screening with transcriptional signatures for incipient TB among U.S. migrants 88%
- Health impact and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in Sindh Province, Pakistan 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative analyses of all FDA EUA-approved rapid antigen tests and RT-PCR for COVID-19 quarantine and surveillance-based isolation 88%
- The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and other public health outcomes during the BA.2/BA.2.12.1 surge, New York City, April-May 2022 87%
- Rising prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum artemisinin resistance mutations in Ethiopia 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.