Back

Racial and ethnic differences in congenital syphilis: mathematical modeling study analyzing the role of prenatal care

Rönn, M. M.; Liang, Y.; Bronsard, M.; Myles, R. L.; Barham, T.; Chesson, H. W.; Miele, K.; Sabety, A.; Molotnikov, L.; Hsu, K.; Gift, T. L.; Salomon, J. A.

2026-02-02 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.01.30.26345236 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSyphilis screening and treatment coverage remain lower than recommended among pregnant women in the US. ObjectiveWe estimated the prevalence and incidence of syphilis among pregnant women, incidence of congenital syphilis and the impact of improved prenatal care cascade by race and ethnicity. DesignCompartmental mathematical model of syphilis natural history, prenatal care, and syphilis screening and testing SettingUnited States ParticipantsPregnant women MeasurementsWomen were stratified by race and ethnicity and whether they received any prenatal care. The model was calibrated to epidemiological data for 2019. InterventionsWe evaluated improvements among women with any prenatal care and in all pregnant women, and we examined 100% treatment completion, first-trimester testing, first-trimester testing with 100% treatment, testing twice and testing twice with 100% treatment. ResultsWe estimated that, per 100,000 pregnant women, 110 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 110-120) had syphilis at pregnancy onset, 13 (95% UI 10-15) acquired syphilis during pregnancy, and 13 (95% UI 12-14) had a syphilis-attributable stillbirth (95% UI 12-14). We estimated a 61% (95% UI 60-62) reduction in non-stillbirth-related congenital syphilis outcomes when at least two syphilis tests were provided and treatment was completed among women who receive prenatal care, and a 98% (95%UI 98- 99%) reduction if two tests were provided and treatment was completed for all pregnant women. The largest benefit of expanding testing and treatment to all pregnant women was seen in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations. LimitationsResults represent national averages and do not account regional variation. ConclusionReaching women without prenatal care would substantially reduce congenital syphilis and racial and ethnic differences in congenital syphilis burden. Primary Funding sourceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
5
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
9
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
13
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%