Back

Appraisal and extension of the ERS/ATS Interpretative Strategy for Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity.

Verbanck, S.; Hughes, M.; Demolder, F.; Wellekens, S.; Vincken, S.; Vanderhelst, E.; Hanon, S.

2026-01-30 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.01.30.26345192 medRxiv
Show abstract

The ERS/ATS22 interpretative flowchart classifies diffusing capacity (DLco) into 5 scenarios with associated pathophysiology, and has not been tested on large patient groups. We aimed to obtain a more layered DLco interpretation, by interrogating DLco components Kco and VA, and by estimating lung inflation during the DLco test to identify the presence of restriction, which crucially impacts Kco interpretation. By assessing a "low VA" against lung inflation, a novel 9-scenario DLco classification with associated pathophysiology can be obtained. Lung patients from a tertiary center were classified according to the ERS/ATS22 chart and the novel 9-scenario one. Besides a control group of healthy subjects (n=303), disease groups under study were the following : asthma (n=1615), COPD (n=1338), CF (n=108), extrapulmonary restriction (n=122), ILD (n=98), post-COVID (n=193). Except for COPD, the prevalence of "normal DLco" (ERS/ATS22) was generally greater than that of "normal VA and normal Kco" (9-scenario); this discrepancy was most marked in CF (81% vs 56%) and in extrapulmonary restriction (57% vs 37%). With the novel 9-scenario chart, patients from very different diagnostic groups with a "low DLco" due to emphysema, bronchial disease, interstitial damage or incomplete expansion got classified across distinct scenarios, whereas ERS/ATS22 just grouped them together. In conclusion, when "low VA" is evaluated against lung inflation, a differentiation of DLco interpretation can be obtained in various patient groups involving obstruction and/or restriction. This approach can be readily implemented in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.7%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
9
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
13
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
14
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%