Back

Profiling the littlest movers: Quantity and predictors of toddlers' physical activity levels measured using a novel machine learning model

Letts, E.; King-Dowling, S.; Di Cristofaro, N.; Tucker, P.; Cairney, J.; Morrison, K. M.; Timmons, B. W.; Obeid, J.

2026-02-01 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.01.30.26345134 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to: (1) quantify toddlers total physical activity (TPA) and guideline adherence using a machine learning method; and (2) explore socio-ecological predictors (e.g., sex, childcare) of TPA. MethodsToddlers (n=103, 21.4 {+/-} 6.9 months, 52% female) from the Hamilton, Canada region completed a gross motor assessment (Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2nd ed; PDMS-2) and wore an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer on the right hip for 4-8 days. Parents completed demographics and physical activity surveys. TPA was estimated using a validated machine learning model and reported using descriptive statistics. Multiple linear regression explored potential predictors of TPA: age, sex, household income, older sibling, BMI-for-age z-score, gross motor z-score, childcare arrangement, parent physical activity, and temperature, controlling for accelerometer wear time. ResultsToddlers had an average of 200.3 {+/-} 44.0 minutes of daily TPA. Most (72%) met the PA guideline of 180 min/day when averaged across days, while only 27% met the guideline on all days. The regression model was significant and explained 57% of the variation in TPA (F13,79 = 8.09, p < 0.0001). Controlling for wear time, the only significant positive predictors were age and PDMS-2 z-score. ConclusionAlmost three quarters of toddlers met the TPA guidelines. Older toddlers and toddlers with more advanced gross motor skills for their age participated in more daily TPA. Future research should continue to apply machine learning methods in more diverse samples and could build on modifiable predictors (e.g., motor skill) to design interventions to improve toddlers PA levels.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
4
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
6
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
10
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
12
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
30
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%