Back

Multiorgan Outcomes Following COVID-19 Vaccine vs Infection: 30M Analysis

Toraih, E. A.; Bruce, D.; Hussein, M. H.; Aiash, H.; Thomas, S. J.

2026-02-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.30.25343064 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and mRNA vaccination remain incompletely defined and lacking comparative outcomes such as sex-specific vulnerabilities. MethodsUsing the TriNetX Research Network (December 2020-December 2024), we identified four mutually exclusive cohorts: uninfected/unvaccinated (naive), infected/unvaccinated, vaccinated-only, and infected/vaccinated (hybrid immunity). We compared 50 prespecified cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and mortality outcomes across four pairwise cohort comparisons, with analyses stratified by sex and time of event windows (0-3, 3- 6, 6-9, and >9months). Different vaccine dosing strategies were analyzed. ResultsAmong 30.3 million individuals, infection was associated with a 4.5-fold increased mortality in males and 4.0-fold in females (p<0.001) as well as marked increases in myocarditis, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism. Inflammatory cardiac complications occurred four times more often after infection than vaccination. Vaccination alone conferred a 76% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in males and 69% in females, with no detectable cardiovascular toxicity. Post-infection vaccination provided an additional 36-38% MACE reduction, though males with hybrid immunity had a late increased risk of pericarditis. Completing the two-dose vaccine series maximally reduced mortality (by 77%) and myocarditis (by 62%) versus single dosing; further doses gave minimal additional benefit but sustained the benefit of the primary vaccination series. Females had higher infection-linked myocarditis risk despite lower mortality. ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 infection confers substantially greater and sustained cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk than mRNA vaccination, confirming a highly favorable benefit-risk profile for vaccination. These findings support extended cardiovascular surveillance after infection and targeted, risk-based vaccination strategies.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
51.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
5
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
6
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
21
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%