Multiorgan Outcomes Following COVID-19 Vaccine vs Infection: 30M Analysis
Toraih, E. A.; Bruce, D.; Hussein, M. H.; Aiash, H.; Thomas, S. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and mRNA vaccination remain incompletely defined and lacking comparative outcomes such as sex-specific vulnerabilities. MethodsUsing the TriNetX Research Network (December 2020-December 2024), we identified four mutually exclusive cohorts: uninfected/unvaccinated (naive), infected/unvaccinated, vaccinated-only, and infected/vaccinated (hybrid immunity). We compared 50 prespecified cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and mortality outcomes across four pairwise cohort comparisons, with analyses stratified by sex and time of event windows (0-3, 3- 6, 6-9, and >9months). Different vaccine dosing strategies were analyzed. ResultsAmong 30.3 million individuals, infection was associated with a 4.5-fold increased mortality in males and 4.0-fold in females (p<0.001) as well as marked increases in myocarditis, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism. Inflammatory cardiac complications occurred four times more often after infection than vaccination. Vaccination alone conferred a 76% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in males and 69% in females, with no detectable cardiovascular toxicity. Post-infection vaccination provided an additional 36-38% MACE reduction, though males with hybrid immunity had a late increased risk of pericarditis. Completing the two-dose vaccine series maximally reduced mortality (by 77%) and myocarditis (by 62%) versus single dosing; further doses gave minimal additional benefit but sustained the benefit of the primary vaccination series. Females had higher infection-linked myocarditis risk despite lower mortality. ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 infection confers substantially greater and sustained cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk than mRNA vaccination, confirming a highly favorable benefit-risk profile for vaccination. These findings support extended cardiovascular surveillance after infection and targeted, risk-based vaccination strategies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 93%
- Splenic CD169 + Tim4 + Marginal Metallophilic Macrophages Are Essential for Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction 92%
- Genetically downregulated interleukin-6 signaling is associated with a favorable cardiometabolic profile: a phenome-wide association study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 92%
- The Genetic Determinants of Aortic Distension 91%
- Assessment of valvular function in over 47,000 people using deep learning-based flow measurements 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of Myocarditis after Covid-19 mRNA Vaccination: Impact of Booster Dose and Dosing Interval 93%
- Increased vaccine sensitivity of an emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant 93%
- Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against infection and COVID-19 hospitalization with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants: BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Actionable druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies repurposing opportunities for COVID-19 91%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a heterologous COVID-19 prime-boost vaccination compared with homologous vaccine regimens 91%
- Polygenic score informed by genome-wide association studies of multiple ancestries and related traits improves risk prediction for coronary artery disease 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.