Back

Testing people's aesthetic appreciation for biodiverse vegetation: Messiness is not a problem

Breitschopf, E.; Feicht, A.; Tynan, E.; Clemmensen, T. J.; Brathen, K. A.

2026-01-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.29.702517 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIBiodiverse vegetation that supports high rates of ecosystem functions can inherently express a messy appearance due to high numbers of local native plant species and their spatial distribution connected to niche complementarity. This messiness is assumed to lower peoples appreciation for vegetation in urban contexts. Since such vegetation and a positive relationship between people and biodiversity could contribute to mitigating biodiversity loss, this assumed low public appreciation warrants investigation. C_LIO_LIWe designed and constructed biodiverse flowerbeds using only local native plants, and with the intention to enhance planting productivity, resistance and resilience. To investigate the influence of messiness, we created flowerbeds in four high levels of species richness (8,12,16,20) shown to be relevant for ecosystem functioning, and three levels of order (no, semi, full). We tested public appreciation for the flowerbeds using a self-guided, on-site survey. C_LIO_LIWe found a positive mean rating for all flowerbeds, but no effect of species richness on the ratings. Increased order, however, had a strong negative effect: The odds of a fully ordered flowerbed receiving a negative rating were 88% higher than of a flowerbed with no order. Increasing designed order was correlated with decreasing plant biomass in the flowerbeds. C_LIO_LIThese findings challenge the assumption that the appearance of biodiverse plantings is too messy for public appreciation in urban contexts. Specifically, we demonstrate that introducing order and reducing messiness can compromise aesthetic appreciation for biodiverse vegetation, potentially by compromising productivity as indicated by lower biomass production in ordered plantings. C_LI Synthesis and applicationOur study shows that biodiverse vegetation can be appreciated in urban contexts. Flowerbeds can effectively serve both people as ornamentation and biodiversity as habitat when they are designed based on ecological principles Research highlightsO_LIWe designed and realized flowerbeds based on ecological principles. C_LIO_LIAll plantings received positive average ratings. C_LIO_LIIncreasing species richness in the flowerbeds did not affect participants aesthetic appreciation. C_LIO_LIIncreasing order in the design of the flowerbeds strongly lowered participants aesthetic appreciation. C_LIO_LIIncreasing order in the design was correlated to lower biomass productivity and more bare soil in the flowerbeds. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.4%
2
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
3
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
7
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%