Back

scDiagnostics: systematic assessment of cell type annotation in single-cell transcriptomics data

Christidis, A.; Ghazi, A. R.; Chawla, S.; Turaga, N.; Gentleman, R.; Geistlinger, L.

2026-02-02 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.01.29.701618 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although cell type annotation has become an integral part of single-cell analysis workflows, the assessment of computational annotations remains challenging. Many annotation tools transfer labels from an annotated reference dataset to a new query dataset of interest, but blindly transferring labels from one dataset to another has its own set of challenges. Often enough there is no perfect alignment between datasets, especially when transferring annotations from a healthy reference atlas for the discovery of disease states. We present scDiagnostics, a new open-source software package that facilitates the detection of complex or ambiguous annotation cases that may otherwise go unnoticed, thus addressing a critical unmet need in current single-cell analysis workflows. scDiagnostics is equipped with novel diagnostic methods that are compatible with all major cell type annotation tools. We demonstrate that scDiagnostics reliably detects complex or conflicting annotations using both carefully designed simulated datasets and diverse real-world single-cell datasets. Our evaluation demonstrates that scDiagnostics reliably identifies misleading annotations that systematically distort downstream analysis and interpretation and that would other-wise remain undetected. The scDiagnostics R package is available from Bioconductor (https://bioconductor.org/packages/scDiagnostics).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.