Left ventricular function and clinical outcomes according to vericiguat and sacubitril/valsartan use in heart failure with nonpreserved ejection fraction: a real-world study
Kinoshita, H.
Show abstract
Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSVericiguat and sacubitril/valsartan both modulate the nitric oxide-soluble guanylate cyclase-cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling pathway and may improve myocardial function in patients with heart failure. ObjectivesTo compare the effects of vericiguat, sacubitril/valsartan, and their combination on left ventricular function and clinical outcomes in heart failure with nonpreserved ejection fraction patients. MethodsIn this retrospective real-world study, patients were classified into three groups: vericiguat added to guideline-directed medical therapy (vericiguat group), sacubitril/valsartan-based therapy (sacubitril/valsartan group), and combined sacubitril/valsartan plus vericiguat therapy (add-vericiguat group). Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction ({Delta}LVEF), in stroke volume ({Delta}SV), and in log-transformed N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ({Delta}Log10 NT-pro BNP) from baseline to 1 year were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were also assessed. ResultsAt 1 year, LVEF significantly improved in both the vericiguat group (p = 0.02) and the sacubitril/valsartan group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in {Delta}LVEF between these two groups (p = 0.25). In contrast, the add-vericiguat group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in {Delta}LVEF compared with the vericiguat group alone (p = 0.01). ConclusionsIn a real-world setting, vericiguat was associated with improvements in left ventricular function comparable to those of sacubitril/valsartan, and combination therapy provided incremental benefits. Vericiguat may serve as an alternative or adjunctive treatment option, particularly in patients unable to tolerate or maintain angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor therapy.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Obesity Modifies Clinical Outcomes of Right Ventricular Dysfunction 95%
- Impact of Advanced Therapy Centers on Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions 95%
- Biomarkers of RV dysfunction in HFrEF identified by direct tissue proteomics: extracellular proteins fibromodulin and fibulin-5 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 95%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 95%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 96%
- The Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Managing Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction 95%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Heart Failure Subtypes and Atrial fibrillation: Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study 95%
- Early left ventricular systolic function is a more sensitive predictor of adverse events after heart transplant 95%
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fragmented QRS is independently predictive of long-term adverse clinical outcomes in Asian patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Right Heart Remodeling in End-Stage Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and the Impact of Treatment Intensity 94%
- Autologous cardiac micrografts as support therapy to coronary artery bypass surgery 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.