Back

Left ventricular function and clinical outcomes according to vericiguat and sacubitril/valsartan use in heart failure with nonpreserved ejection fraction: a real-world study

Kinoshita, H.

2026-02-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.29.26345176 medRxiv
Show abstract

Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSVericiguat and sacubitril/valsartan both modulate the nitric oxide-soluble guanylate cyclase-cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling pathway and may improve myocardial function in patients with heart failure. ObjectivesTo compare the effects of vericiguat, sacubitril/valsartan, and their combination on left ventricular function and clinical outcomes in heart failure with nonpreserved ejection fraction patients. MethodsIn this retrospective real-world study, patients were classified into three groups: vericiguat added to guideline-directed medical therapy (vericiguat group), sacubitril/valsartan-based therapy (sacubitril/valsartan group), and combined sacubitril/valsartan plus vericiguat therapy (add-vericiguat group). Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction ({Delta}LVEF), in stroke volume ({Delta}SV), and in log-transformed N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ({Delta}Log10 NT-pro BNP) from baseline to 1 year were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were also assessed. ResultsAt 1 year, LVEF significantly improved in both the vericiguat group (p = 0.02) and the sacubitril/valsartan group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in {Delta}LVEF between these two groups (p = 0.25). In contrast, the add-vericiguat group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in {Delta}LVEF compared with the vericiguat group alone (p = 0.01). ConclusionsIn a real-world setting, vericiguat was associated with improvements in left ventricular function comparable to those of sacubitril/valsartan, and combination therapy provided incremental benefits. Vericiguat may serve as an alternative or adjunctive treatment option, particularly in patients unable to tolerate or maintain angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor therapy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.