Back

Left ventricular function and clinical outcomes according to vericiguat and sacubitril/valsartan use in heart failure with nonpreserved ejection fraction: a real-world study

Kinoshita, H.

2026-02-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.29.26345176 medRxiv
Show abstract

Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSVericiguat and sacubitril/valsartan both modulate the nitric oxide-soluble guanylate cyclase-cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling pathway and may improve myocardial function in patients with heart failure. ObjectivesTo compare the effects of vericiguat, sacubitril/valsartan, and their combination on left ventricular function and clinical outcomes in heart failure with nonpreserved ejection fraction patients. MethodsIn this retrospective real-world study, patients were classified into three groups: vericiguat added to guideline-directed medical therapy (vericiguat group), sacubitril/valsartan-based therapy (sacubitril/valsartan group), and combined sacubitril/valsartan plus vericiguat therapy (add-vericiguat group). Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction ({Delta}LVEF), in stroke volume ({Delta}SV), and in log-transformed N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ({Delta}Log10 NT-pro BNP) from baseline to 1 year were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were also assessed. ResultsAt 1 year, LVEF significantly improved in both the vericiguat group (p = 0.02) and the sacubitril/valsartan group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in {Delta}LVEF between these two groups (p = 0.25). In contrast, the add-vericiguat group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in {Delta}LVEF compared with the vericiguat group alone (p = 0.01). ConclusionsIn a real-world setting, vericiguat was associated with improvements in left ventricular function comparable to those of sacubitril/valsartan, and combination therapy provided incremental benefits. Vericiguat may serve as an alternative or adjunctive treatment option, particularly in patients unable to tolerate or maintain angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor therapy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.3%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
4
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
6
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
8
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
9
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
11
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
15
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
24
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%