Perspectives of Interventional Cardiologists and Cardiothoracic Surgeons on the Late Diagnosis and Undertreatment of Women Diagnosed with Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
Platanis, M. J.; McDonnell, K. K.; Slone, S. E.; Thamman, R.; Wickersham, K. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe prevalence of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (sSAS) continues to rise, yet women remain significantly less likely to receive timely intervention. Evidence indicates a 36% lower likelihood of diagnosis and a 20% lower likelihood of undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared with men. The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons who treat AS about late diagnosis and undertreatment of women with sSAS. MethodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons across the United States. Participants completed a 10-item open-ended questionnaire developed from published literature. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis to identify key issues related to diagnostic practices, referral patterns, and provider perceptions. ResultsNineteen physicians completed the survey (15% response rate). While most participants believed women receive timely AVR consistent with guidelines, they acknowledged delays due to multifactorial causes, including under-recognition of symptoms, diagnostic variability in community echocardiography practices, limited awareness of sex-specific guideline gaps, and socioeconomic barriers such as financial constraints, caregiver burden, and access to care. Although some respondents denied overt gender bias, others described subtle or unconscious bias influencing referral timing and symptom interpretation. ConclusionsSurvey respondents recognized complex clinical and systemic factors contributing to delayed diagnosis and undertreatment of women with sSAS. Enhanced provider education, improved access to diagnostic testing, and revision of sex-specific clinical guidelines are needed to promote equitable care and timely intervention for female patients.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Gaps of Care for Congenital Heart Disease Patients: Implications for Social Determinants of Health and Child Opportunity Index 95%
- Patient Risk-Benefit Preferences for Transcatheter versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair 95%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of coronary revascularization treatment timing on mortality in patients with stable ischemic heart disease in British Columbia 93%
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 93%
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 93%
- Higher mortality in male patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy appears to be related to higher complication rates 93%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Referral for Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Result of Quality Outcome Project 95%
- Comparison of in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes among patients greater than and less than 80 years undergoing TAVR 94%
- Hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.