Back

Perspectives of Interventional Cardiologists and Cardiothoracic Surgeons on the Late Diagnosis and Undertreatment of Women Diagnosed with Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis

Platanis, M. J.; McDonnell, K. K.; Slone, S. E.; Thamman, R.; Wickersham, K. E.

2026-02-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.29.26345174 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe prevalence of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (sSAS) continues to rise, yet women remain significantly less likely to receive timely intervention. Evidence indicates a 36% lower likelihood of diagnosis and a 20% lower likelihood of undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared with men. The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons who treat AS about late diagnosis and undertreatment of women with sSAS. MethodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons across the United States. Participants completed a 10-item open-ended questionnaire developed from published literature. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis to identify key issues related to diagnostic practices, referral patterns, and provider perceptions. ResultsNineteen physicians completed the survey (15% response rate). While most participants believed women receive timely AVR consistent with guidelines, they acknowledged delays due to multifactorial causes, including under-recognition of symptoms, diagnostic variability in community echocardiography practices, limited awareness of sex-specific guideline gaps, and socioeconomic barriers such as financial constraints, caregiver burden, and access to care. Although some respondents denied overt gender bias, others described subtle or unconscious bias influencing referral timing and symptom interpretation. ConclusionsSurvey respondents recognized complex clinical and systemic factors contributing to delayed diagnosis and undertreatment of women with sSAS. Enhanced provider education, improved access to diagnostic testing, and revision of sex-specific clinical guidelines are needed to promote equitable care and timely intervention for female patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
4
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
9
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.6%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
12
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
20
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%