Evaluating metagenomic sequencing as a stool-based diagnostic in children with presumptive TB in Uganda
Agudelo, C.; Nsereko, M.; Ainebyona, A.; Andama, A.; Castro, R.; Leung, S. R. M.; Nakafeero, J.; Nannyonga, G.; Nolan, K.; Teran, L.; Young, M. G.; Wambi, P.; Kato-Maeda, M.; Cattamanchi, A.; Jaganath, D.; Wobudeya, E.; Wolf, A. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundStool-based molecular tests are a noninvasive option for pediatric tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis, but have lower sensitivity compared to sputum-based tests. Untargeted metagenomic sequencing (mNGS) on stool could improve sensitivity and identify new gene targets for molecular testing. MethodsWe performed shotgun mNGS on DNA isolated from stool samples of children undergoing assessment for pulmonary TB in Uganda. We defined the performance of mNGS to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) against a microbiological reference standard (MRS, TB if sputum Xpert Ultra or culture positive) and a composite reference standard (TB if confirmed or unconfirmed TB). We also compared accuracy of mNGS against the stool-based Xpert Ultra test. Finally, we identified enriched genomic loci among Mtb classified reads. ResultsWe analyzed 176 stool samples of children with a median age of 3.6 years (IQR, 1-6 years). !"#$%&()*(+,-. ()*(&*%&$$/$$*&(01(234-(5$)(60&$$/*(78(9*1$%*9(as [≥] 1, 2, or 5 sequence fragments were 35.5% (95% CI 19%:;;<=.(>;?@<(AB>< : 45%), and 19.4% (13%-25%) respectively, and specificities 92.64% (87%-96%), 97% (93%-99%), and 99.3% (96%-100%). Stool Xpert Ultra had similar sensitivity (22.6%) to stool mNGS considering all samples tested. In a head-to-head comparison, stool mNGS had lower sensitivity than stool Xpert Ultra (38.5% vs. 53.8%, difference -15.3%, 95% CI 14-68 to 25-81). mNGS utilized rRNA, virulence proteins and membrane proteins not targeted in current PCR-based platforms. ConclusionsMetagenomic sequencing of stool DNA did not increase sensitivity of TB detection, but identified novel targets for molecular testing that may support development of more sensitive tests.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic Sequencing from Sputum for Tuberculosis Disease Diagnosis, Lineage Determination and Drug Susceptibility Prediction 95%
- Host blood protein biomarkers to screen for Tuberculosis disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Accuracy of tongue swab testing using Xpert MTB-RIF Ultra for tuberculosis diagnosis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Testing tongue swab samples by Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Comparison of two protocols applied to samples from persons with low-bacillary load TB 95%
- Feasibility and Sensitivity of Saliva GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Adults in Uganda 94%
- Development of a multiplex real-time PCR assay for BCG and validation in a clinical laboratory 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- C-reactive protein for pulmonary tuberculosis screening and treatment response monitoring in children 94%
- Programmatic diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of Xpert MTB/XDR in patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Georgia 94%
- Multiplex PCR detection of enteric pathogens in a community-based birth cohort in Ecuador: comparison of xTAG-GPP and TaqMan array card assays 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stool processing methods for Xpert Ultra testing in childhood tuberculosis: A prospective, multi-country accuracy study 95%
- New manual qPCR assay validated on tongue swabs collected and processed in Uganda shows sensitivity that rivals sputum-based molecular TB diagnostics 95%
- Exhaled Mycobacterium tuberculosis predicts incident infection in household contacts 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.