Back

Mortality burden of outdoor occupational heat exposure in the United States

Shkembi, A.; Schinasi, L. H.; Payne-Sturges, D.; Neitzel, R. L.

2026-01-30 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.01.29.26345131 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOutdoor workers are particularly vulnerable to the adverse impacts of heat, but many studies focus on heat exposure in residential settings only. This leads to a limited understanding of the full mortality burden due to occupational heat exposures. Here, we aimed to improve estimates of the total, short-term mortality burden attributable to outdoor occupational heat exposure in the United States (US). MethodsWe developed a panel data set for 3,108 US counties during 2010-2019 by linking all-cause mortality among the working age population, derived from CDC WONDER, with the prevalence of workers exposed to outdoor occupational heat, which integrates data on wet bulb globe temperature, workplace activities, and employment counts. We developed a quasi-Poisson regression model adjusted for ambient temperature, total precipitation, and county and state-year fixed effects to estimate short-term excess deaths attributable to outdoor occupational heat exposure. FindingsNationwide, approximately 3.8% (95% CI: 2.5-5.8%) of all workers were annually exposed to dangerous wet-bulb globe temperatures. This outdoor occupational heat exposure resulted in approximately 9,800 (3,100-17,000) annual excess deaths in the working age population. An estimated 62% of excess deaths occurred in the most socially vulnerable counties despite accounting for 25% of workers. InterpretationThe mortality burden of occupational heat exposure is likely far larger than 39 officially reported annual deaths that the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports for this time period. The workplace should be an explicit focus of heat policies, advocacy, and adaptation measures. FundingUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
9
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%