Back

fMRI analysis parameters affect the concordance with TMS in noninvasive speech mapping

Gogulski, J. D.; Autti, S.; Vasileiadi, M.; Tik, M.; Vaalto, S.; Renvall, H.; Liljestrom, M.; Lioumis, P.

2026-01-30 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.01.29.26345106 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSpeech cortical mapping (SCM) conducted with widely available functional MRI (fMRI) can yield divergent results compared to the more commonly used navigated TMS (nTMS). The impact of specific fMRI task paradigms and preprocessing choices on reaching similarity with nTMS has not been explored before. ObjectiveTo test how the fMRI experimental task and spatial smoothing of the data compare with nTMS-based results, to subsequently increase the reliability of object naming fMRI for SCM. MethodsThirteen healthy, right-handed Finnish speakers underwent an nTMS-based SCM experiment in which the left hemisphere was stimulated while the subjects overtly named common visually presented stimuli. Standard as well as magnetoencephalography-informed picture-to-TMS intervals were applied. The same participants completed fMRI with overt naming, silent naming, and observation tasks on the same stimuli, analyzed with 0-, 3-, and 6-mm spatial smoothing. nTMS-based error and non-error sites were converted to volumetric density maps, and error-specific maps were derived by subtracting non-error from error density. Spatial similarity between binarized fMRI maps and nTMS maps was quantified using Jaccard index. Within-session fMRI reliability was estimated with voxel- and subjectwise concordance correlation coefficients across two separate runs conducted on the same day. ResultsSimilarity between fMRI and nTMS maps was overall low but depended significantly on data smoothing. Within subjects, mean error-specific Jaccard index was 0.036, with most individuals showing maximal similarity at 6 mm of smoothing. The fMRI task resulting in highest similarity with the nTMS map varied across participants, but at the group level, silent naming with 6-mm smoothing yielded the best correspondence. In general, within-session fMRI reliability increased with greater smoothing. ConclusionThe amount of applied fMRI data smoothing shapes the agreement of fMRI and nTMS maps during SCM. Silent naming fMRI combined with 6-mm data smoothing yielded the highest overlap with nTMS maps, yet the effect of the experimental task was statistically non-significant and the absolute similarity of the maps remained low. These results underline the different views to brain functions provided by direct perturbation of neural functions vs. blood-oxygenation based fMRI, and offer practical guidance when combining fMRI with nTMS in noninvasive speech cortical mapping. HighlightsO_LICorrespondence of fMRI and TMS speech cortical mapping results varied across individuals C_LIO_LIConcordance between the methods was generally low and depended on the fMRI data smoothing C_LIO_LISilent naming task in fMRI, combined with 6-mm data smoothing, yielded highest similarity to nTMS C_LIO_LIWithin-session fMRI reliability increased with greater smoothing C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
14.4%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.1%
3
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
10
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
12
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%