Back

Nanoscale Protonation Limits and Charge Density in Polymer Films Govern the Activity of Immobilized LacZ under Acid Stress

Duan, H.; Chen, J.; Fianu, F.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Y.

2026-01-29 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.28.702428 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Under acidic conditions, polycationic polymer coatings function as protective immobilization supports through protonation-mediated local pH buffering. However, it remains unclear how polymer support design parameters, such as film thickness and charge density, govern that vital protonation process. Leveraging the precise control of film thickness and copolymer composition enabled by initiated chemical vapor deposition (iCVD), we systematically investigated how these parameters govern the protonation behavior of poly[glycidyl methacrylate-co-2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate] (pGD) thin films and, in turn, the activity of immobilized {beta}-galactosidase (LacZ). Infrared spectroscopy suggests that proton penetration was capped at a depth of [~]250 nm in pGD with 65% DMAEMA, limiting the polycationic thickness in pGD films thicker than this value. Consistent with this limit, immobilized LacZ activity under acidic stress (pH 4) increased with protonated thickness up to [~]250 nm and then plateaued. Raising the polycationic monomer content from 25 to 65 mol% increased LacZ activity at pH 4 by up to 83%, consistent with a higher positive charge density providing stronger local pH buffering. To test whether this behavior depends on immobilization sites, we evaluated two approaches: random immobilization (via amine-epoxy ring-opening reactions) and site-directed immobilization (via SpyCatcher/SpyTag binding). Directed immobilization preserved higher LacZ activity than random immobilization, but the protonation-dependent protection trend remained consistent for both strategies. These findings establish protonation depth and charge density as tunable design parameters for polycationic immobilization supports that stabilize enzymes under acidic conditions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
3
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
5
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
6
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
9
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
14
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%