Back

Combined Lytic Score as a new metric to quantify phage-host specificity, tested in a screening study on a collection of Salmonella strains.

Rozanski, M.; Adamiak, N.; Pospiech, K.; Grochala, K.; Witaszewska, J.; Matczak, J. K.; Wojcik, E. A.; Dastych, J.

2026-01-30 microbiology
10.64898/2026.01.28.702309 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacteriophages are promising alternatives for antibiotics. One challenge of developing bacteriophage-based preparation for practical application is to understand expected host range of such products. We evaluated the host range and lytic activity of BAFASAL(R), a four-phage cocktail targeting Salmonella in poultry production. For that purpose, we developed a new composite metric, the Combined Lytic Score (CLS), integrating results from two in vitro assays: serial dilutions spot test on semisolid medium and spectrophotometric growth inhibition in liquid culture. Using this approach phage cocktail was tested against collection of 72 Salmonella strains, including 55 S. Enteritidis isolates representing diverse geographic origins and genomic backgrounds. Spot test patterns were transformed into a continuous scale using the Most Probable Number (MPN) approach to estimate the number of phages required for visible lysis. In parallel, growth inhibition was quantified as the area-under-curve-based inhibition score (ANS). Both metrics were normalized and combined into CLS as a projection onto the regression line describing their correlation (R{superscript 2} {approx} 0.82). More than 65% of S. Enteritidis strains, reached normalized CLS values higher 75%, indicating high susceptibility to BAFASAL(R) in vitro. Phage susceptibility did not correlate with either phenotypic antibiotic resistance or the number of resistance and virulence genes. CLS provides a quantitative method to integrate different experimental methods of determination of bacterial susceptibility to bacteriophages and to rank bacterial strains by phage susceptibility. This approach supports robust host range determination and may facilitate regulatory evaluation and rational design of phage-based interventions in food safety and animal production. IMPORTANCEAssessment of bacteriophage host range is an important step in characterization of bacteriophage strains both in basic and translational research, yet it is still commonly based on qualitative or poorly standardized assays. This lack of harmonization limits reproducibility and complicates comparisons across studies, laboratories, and application contexts. In this work, we propose the Combined Lytic Score (CLS) as a quantitative framework that integrates outcomes from two widely used experimental approaches: serial-dilution spot assays and microtiter-based growth inhibition kinetics. By converting spot-test results into a continuous, concentration-dependent metric and combining them with normalized kinetic inhibition data, CLS enables more consistent interpretation of phage-host interaction outcomes. Application of CLS to a diverse collection of Salmonella enterica strains demonstrates how this approach can support systematic, scalable host range analyses. The CLS framework provides a practical step toward improved standardization of phage susceptibility testing, facilitating clearer data interpretation and comparison in both environmental and applied microbiology research.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
6
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%