Back

Predicting agronomic performance of maize landraces in various and future environments by combining genomic prediction and ecogenetics

Galaretto, A. O.; Pegard, M.; Malvar, R. A.; Moreau, L.; Butron, A.; Revilla, P.; Madur, D.; Combes, V.; Balconi, C.; Bauland, C.; Mendes-Moreira, P.; Sarcevic, H.; Barata, A. M.; Murariu, D.; Schierscher-Viret, B.; Stringens, A.; Andjelkovic, V.; Goritschnig, S.; Gouesnard, B.; Charcosset, A.; Nicolas, S. D.

2026-01-29 genomics
10.64898/2026.01.28.699851 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Maize traditional populations (landraces) hold valuable genetic diversity for addressing climate change and low-input agriculture but remain underutilized due to lack of evaluations. High-throughput pool genotyping (HPG) has been previously used to characterize diversity but its potential for implementing genomic prediction (GP) and genomic offset (GO) for maize landraces has not been tested yet. We developed HPG-based GP models, combined or not with GO and within-population gene diversity (Hs), calibrated using 397 European landraces evaluated across environments and use cases. GP alone showed high predictive ability for yield (0.75), plant height (0.92) and male flowering time (0.94). Including Hs and GO in the GP model improved by 13% the predictive abilities for grain yield of new landraces in new environments. Our model provided phenotypic adaptive landscapes for each landrace in future climatic scenarios and predicted that agronomic performance stability increases with Hs. Combining GP with eco-genetic predictions made it possible to identify promising landraces to improve adaptation to future or new cultivation conditions. TeaserIdentify promising landrace adapted to new and future environments by combining genomic selection and offset

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.5%
2
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
6
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
10
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
11
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
14
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%