Safety in Adolescent Behavioral Health Crisis Units: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinicians Versus Designers Perspectives
Jafarifiroozabadi, R.; Patel, H.; Clements, P. T.
Show abstract
Safety is a foundational concern in adolescent behavioral health crisis units (BHCUs), where therapeutic care must be delivered in complex, rapidly evolving environments. However, limited research has explored how key personnel involved in shaping the environment of care in such units, such as clinicians and healthcare designers, understand and prioritize safety. To address this gap, one-hour, online semi-structured interviews were conducted with a panel of experts (N = 13) at a national level in the U.S., comprising of eight designers (healthcare designers and medical planners) and five clinicians (psychologists and psychiatric nurses) actively involved in designing or construction of BHCUs or providing care in these units for adolescent patients in the past five years. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed via MAXQDA (2024) for qualitative content analysis. Analysis of interviews revealed 592 codes forming four preliminary categories related to safety in adolescent BHCUs: 1) Barriers and facilitators to patient safety and comfort (f = 52%), 2) Care processes and clinical workflows (f = 21%), 3) Care outcomes (f = 19%), and 4) Laws, regulations, and guidelines (f = 7%). Findings highlighted several points of divergence in clinicians versus designers perception of safety related to environmental features, such as nursing station designs, patients access and control over unit features, and furniture type or layout in the unit. Results also showed differences in understanding care processes and outcomes related to safety among the two groups. Addressing such discrepancies can contribute to the development of safer BHCUs that support adolescents healing.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 95%
- Caregivers’ and nurses’ perceptions of the Smart Discharges Program for children with sepsis in Uganda: A descriptive qualitative study 95%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 96%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 94%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- What has been the impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture? A case study from a large metropolitan teaching hospital. 94%
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 92%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 95%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 95%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 93%
- Public involvement to enhance care home research; collaboration on a minimum data set for care homes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.