Back

AcceleRest: A Physiology-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Wrist Accelerometer-based Sleep Staging and Apnea Evaluation

Lorenzen, N. R.; Brink-Kjaer, A.; Jennum, P. J.; Mignot, E.

2026-01-30 health informatics
10.64898/2026.01.28.26345056
Show abstract

Sleep is essential for physical and mental health, yet large-scale assessment of sleep stages and sleep apnea is limited by the cost and burden of clinical polysomnography. Wrist accelerometry provides a scalable lower-fidelity alternative, but its usefulness is highly reliant on modeling choices. Generative self-supervised learning has remained unexplored for this purpose. To address this, we developed and pretrained physiology-aware masked autoencoders to capture pulse-and respiration-related motion using [~]700,000 days of wrist accelerometry from 108,904 recordings in the UK Biobank cohort. This effort culminated in AcceleRest, a transformer model pretrained using a respiratory amplification objective. Performance was validated against polysomnography across 478 recordings from six cohorts and devices including independent external test cohorts. AcceleRest feature vectors enabled linear wake-NREM-REM sleep staging with a macro F1 score of 0.69 and respiratory event detection with a macro F1 of 0.56. The combined model outputs enabled sleep apnea severity evaluation with a 67% sensitivity and 96% specificity for severe apnea. Overall agreement between polysomnography and AcceleRest showed a bias of 0.8 min for total sleep duration, with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of -101.6 to 103.2 min, and 32.5 min for REM sleep duration and 95% LoA of -68.7 to 133.6 min. These findings demonstrate that physiology-aware pretraining can enable robust and clinically meaningful sleep phenotyping from wrist accelerometers, supporting scalable screening and longitudinal monitoring of sleep health. To the best of our knowledge, AcceleRest represents the first wrist accelerometry model for joint sleep stage and apnea evaluation. All code and models will be made available upon final peer-reviewed publication.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 2%
18.1%
2
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 9%
8.1%
3
Journal of Sleep Research
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
8.1%
4
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 2%
8.1%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 70%
4.8%
6
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Neural Engineering
based on 19 papers
Top 0.9%
2.6%
8
SLEEP
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 4%
2.5%
10
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 7%
1.9%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
1.7%
12
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Patterns
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
15
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 10%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Psychiatry
based on 56 papers
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
21
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 23%
0.7%
22
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.7%