Back

Pharmacogenomic predictors of drug response and choice in dyslipidemia and hypertension

Takeuchi, F.; Dona, M. S. I.; Ho, W. W. H.; Lambert, S. A.; Inouye, M.; Kato, N.

2026-01-30 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.01.28.26345024 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDrug suitability is determined by safety, efficacy, and pathological appropriateness. The pharmacogenomics of drug suitability can be assessed by analyzing drug response and drug choice in large population cohorts. MethodsWe investigated drug response and drug choice for dyslipidemia and hypertension using genetic, phenotypic, and prescribing data from the UK Biobank and the All of Us Research Program. Drug response was reassessed with rigorous biomarker scaling, while genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and polygenic scores were used to examine genetic factors influencing drug choice. ResultsConventional analyses showed that variants influencing baseline LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) were inversely associated with absolute LDL-C change but concordant with relative change following statin therapy; these signals disappeared after applying a variance-stabilizing Box-Cox transformation, indicating a methodological artifact in biomarker scaling. GWAS for drug choice identified several significant loci and unique genetic correlation patterns with cardiometabolic traits. Polygenic scores for drug choice yielded statistically significant predictive performance, which was enhanced by incorporating demographic factors, though prediction strength in clinical settings remains modest. ConclusionVariance-stabilizing transformation corrects spurious pharmacogenetic associations introduced by biomarker scaling. Genetic variation informs drug choice for dyslipidemia and hypertension, but current polygenic scores provide only modest benefits in clinical application.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
3
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
4
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
6
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
7
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
13
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
19
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
23
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
27
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%