Back

Development of Visually Indistinguishable Acoustic Coupling Pads for Double-Blind Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation Studies

Schafer, S.; Spivak, N.; Bishay, A.; Bystritsky, A.; Lewin, P. A.; Schafer, M. E.

2026-01-30 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.27.702113 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation modality with the ability to target deep brain structures with high spatial precision. Despite its promise, rigorous evaluation of its efficacy is limited by the absence of reliable, fully double-blind sham methodologies. ObjectiveTo develop and validate a pair of visually and mechanically indistinguishable acoustic coupling pads that enable true double-blind tFUS neuromodulation studies by providing either efficient ultrasound transmission or robust ultrasound blocking without altering participant or operator experience. MethodsTwo coupling pads were engineered: a transmitting pad designed to allow <5% pressure amplitude loss relative to free-water propagation, and a non-transmitting pad designed to attenuate ultrasound by [&ge;]40 dB. Both pads used a Dragon Skin 10 NV silicone base and were identical in size, appearance, flexibility, and handling. The non-transmitting pad incorporated an encapsulated air-based blocking layer using an open-cell polyethylene foam insert. Acoustic performance was evaluated in a water tank using a 650 kHz BrainSonix transducer and a calibrated needle hydrophone. Sound speed of the silicone material was measured using pulse-echo techniques. ResultsTwenty-three matched transmitting and non-transmitting pad pairs were fabricated and tested. Transmitting pads demonstrated a mean attenuation of -0.41 {+/-} 0.53 dB, satisfying the design criterion of minimal acoustic loss.Non-transmitting pads demonstrated a mean attenuation of -48.61 {+/-} 4.33 dB, exceeding the required -40 dB threshold for effective sham conditions. The Dragon Skin 10 NV substrate exhibited a sound speed of 964.72 m/s and produced <2 mm axial focal shift for standard pad thicknesses, with no measurable change in focal width. Both pad types were visually and tactually indistinguishable, could not be differentiated by experienced operators or participants, and maintained mechanical integrity after repeated cleaning ConclusionThese acoustically engineered coupling pads provide a practical and validated solution for achieving true single- and double-blind conditions in tFUS neuromodulation studies. By preserving identical sensory and procedural experiences while enabling precise control over ultrasound transmission, this approach addresses a critical methodological gap in human ultrasound neuromodulation research.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.6%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%