Back

An adaptive multi-strategy metaheuristic for robust model calibration in large-scale systems biology

Polo-Rodriguez, A.; Penas, D. R.; Banga, J. R.

2026-01-30 systems biology
10.64898/2026.01.27.701977 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Parameter estimation is a central challenge in systems biology, particularly for large dynamic models described by nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs). These global optimization problems exhibit landscapes which are topologically heterogeneous, often exhibiting a pathological mixture of stiff, smooth valleys and rugged, noisy plateaus, making single-strategy hybrids ineffective. While methods like enhanced Scatter Search (eSS) represent the current state-of-the-art, their rigid intensification strategies can limit performance in large-scale or ill-conditioned scenarios. In this work, we introduce eLSHADE+, a novel metaheuristic architecture designed to adapt to these topological challenges. The proposed algorithm augments a recent Differential Evolution variant (LSHADE) with a probabilistic multistrategy hybridization. Unlike standard memetic algorithms, eLSHADE+ uses three distinct operational modes: (i) gradient-based intensification for precision in differentiable regions, (ii) derivative-free search for robustness against numerical noise, and (iii) pure global exploration to conserve computational resources in complicated basins. Additionally, a logarithmic parameter space transformation is incorporated to facilitate search across multi-scale biological constants. We rigorously evaluated eLSHADE+ using the BioPreDyn benchmark suite, comprising challenging real-world problems. Comparative analysis demonstrates that this adaptive multi-strategy approach yields statistically superior convergence speed and solution accuracy compared to eSS and other competitive metaheuristics, establishing a new baseline for robust model calibration in computational biology. Code and data are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18379327.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.