Back

Techno-functional properties of clover grass protein and the effect of different process technologies

Badfar, N.; Gregersen Echers, S.; Jacobsen, C.; Yesiltas, B.; Jorgensen, A. K.; Mattsson, T.; Lubeck, P. S.; Mishra, A.; Sancho, A. I.; Bogh, K. L.; Lubeck, M.

2026-01-29 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.27.701969 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study investigated the effects of different downstream processes for protein isolation on the bulk properties and composition of clover grass protein prototypes (CGPs). A clarified clover grass juice, obtained using membrane filtration (MF), underwent precipitation by acid (AP), heat (HP), or acid+heat (AHP), or underwent ultra- and diafiltration to produce a concentrate (DC) as well as subsequent tryptic hydrolysis of DC (DCH). HP had the highest protein content (p<0.05) and was whiter than other CGPs, although it showed lower aqueous solubility. In contrast, DC showed excellent solubility across a broad pH range. CGPs efficiently decreased oil-water interfacial tension (16-13 mN/m) and displayed viscoelastic and solid-like interfacial behavior. CGPs-stabilized emulsions displayed low physical stability with larger droplets despite high absolute {zeta}-potentials. CGPs were rich in RuBisCO (37-47%) but had varying levels of other proteins. Despite significant protein-level differences, overall protein composition of CGPs was comparable, highlighting that protein state governs bulk functionality more than subtle compositional changes. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=108 SRC="FIGDIR/small/701969v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f37756org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fb5beorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d4efe2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d11ef8_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Created with BioRender.com HighlightsO_LIThe effect of different processes on functional properties of CGPs was explored. C_LIO_LIHeat treatment increased protein purity and whiteness at the expense of solubility. C_LIO_LICGPs efficiently reduced O/W interfacial tension but produced unstable emulsions. C_LIO_LICGPs were found rich in RuBisCO (34-47%) using quantitative proteomics. C_LIO_LIProtein state had larger influence on functionality than protein-level composition. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
3
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
4
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
7
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
12
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
15
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
20
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
23
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
24
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
25
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
29
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%