Back

Compression Detects Changes in Spiking Neural Data from Cortical Lesions

Tor, A.; Wu, Y.; Clarke, S. E.; Yamada, L.; Weissman, T.; Nuyujukian, P.; Brain Interfacing Laboratory,

2026-01-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.27.701628 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1ObjectiveThe complexity of neural data changes as the brain processes information during events. Universal lossless compression algorithms, which are broadly applicable and grounded in information theory, identify and exploit redundancies in data in order to compress it to essentially-optimal sizes regardless of underlying statistics. These algorithms may be used to conveniently and efficiently estimate a given signals Shannon entropy rate, a biologically relevant measure of the complexity of a signal. It is therefore natural to explore their effectiveness in the analysis of spiking neural data. ApproachThis work focuses on using compression to analyze recordings (96-channel Utah arrays) taken from motor cortex of animals performing reaching tasks for three days before and three days after administering electrolytic lesions (Subject U: 4 lesions, H: 3). In particular, we use the inverse compression ratio (ICR), which compares the sizes of compressed and uncompressed data to estimate the amount of statistically unique information. We calculate ICR with temporally-independent lossless compression (gzip) and temporally-dependent lossy compression (H.264, MPEG-2). Compression-based ICR was compared to single-neuron measures used to understand spiking data, such as average firing rates and Fano factor. Compression is also compared to common dimensionality reduction techniques, principal component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis (FA). Main ResultsStatistical tests on aggregate data comparing each metric before and after lesioning reveal that ICR is able to significantly (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.01) detect lesions with higher accuracy than single-neuron metrics, but not dimensionality reduction (ICR methods: 85.7%, single-neuron methods: 78.6%, dimensionality reduction: 100%). Additionally, statistical results on the same data show that ICR metrics remain more stable than single-neuron methods after lesion. The bitrate parameter of lossy compression algorithms is swept to better understand the effect of information rates and "optimal" compression on lesion detection performance. Our conclusions are confirmed by the same analyses performed on several different simulated neural datasets. SignificanceThese results suggest that compression algorithms may be a useful tool to detect and better understand perturbations to the underlying structure of neural data. Information-theoretic analyses may complement techniques like dimensionality reduction and firing rate tuning as a convenient and useful tool to characterize neural data.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
9
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
11
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%
27
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%