Developing internationally agreed core indicators for surveillance of preconception health: protocol for a consensus study
Schoenaker, D.; Hall, J.; Al-Jayyousi, G. F.; Borges, A. L. V.; Boua, P. R.; Chan, J. K. Y.; Chitashvili, T.; Delbaere, I.; Demidova, A.; Fikadu, K.; Fisher, S.; Hazra, A.; James, S.; Ku, C. W.; Maeda, E.; Memon, Z.; Munblit, D.; Mulders, A.; Murira, Z.; Norman, W. V.; Ogle, A.; Sethi, V.; Shahbic, H. I.; Kakoly, N. S.; Verbiest, S.; Stephenson, J.; the International Core Indicators for Preconception Health and Equity (iCIPHE) Alliance,
Show abstract
BackgroundInterventions and policies to optimise preconception health are increasing internationally. This stems from growing recognition that improving preconception health can improve maternal and child health outcomes and advance equity by reducing inequalities and address inequities for people of reproductive age and any children they may have. Interventions and policies should be evaluated through population-level surveillance of preconception health to inform the development of new initiatives, monitor effectiveness, and support advocacy for international adoption of successful strategies. However, there is currently no internationally agreed set of preconception health indicators available and suitable for international surveillance. The International Core Indicators for Preconception Health and Equity (iCIPHE) Alliance was established to address this gap. AimTo prioritise core indicators that can be used in low-, middle- and high-income countries for surveillance of preconception health and equity. MethodsWe held two workshops with the iCIPHE Alliance (multi-sectoral stakeholders from low-, middle- and high-income countries) to inform the design of this international consensus study. The development of core indicators will consist of three steps: (1) identifying an initial long-list of candidate surveillance indicators, and defining principles for scoring the importance of each indicator, through a literature review, public involvement, and workshops with iCIPHE Alliance members; (2) scoring each candidate indicator in terms of its importance for surveillance through a two-round Delphi survey among study participants; and (3) agreeing on the final core indicators through a series of consensus meetings with a selected group of study participants. We will recruit study participants from all World Health Organization (WHO) regions across four stakeholder groups: people of reproductive age (who do not belong to any of the other stakeholder groups); health and social care professionals; policy and programme professionals; and researchers. Ethical approvalThis study has been approved by the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ERGO 104447). DisseminationWe will disseminate the priority core indicators through peer-reviewed publication, lay summaries, policy briefs and presentations. An implementation strategy, to enable monitoring of inequalities, inequities, and changes in preconception health over time within and between countries, will be developed with relevant national and international organisations to inform next steps.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation on birth weight in Ethiopia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial 94%
- A collaborative maternity and newborn dashboard (CoMaND) for the COVID-19 pandemic: a protocol for timely, adaptive monitoring of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne, Australia 94%
- Birhan Maternal and Child Health cohort: a study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 95%
- Measuring progress on health and well-being in the Eastern Mediterranean Region via voluntary national reviews, 2016 - 2021: what does the data reveal? 95%
- Acceptability and perceived barriers to adoption of the core outcome set for maternal and neonatal health research and surveillance during emerging and ongoing epidemic threats (MNH-EPI-COS). An online survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
- Protocol For The Development Of A Core Outcome Set For Respectful Maternal And Newborn Care In A Low-Middle Income Setting 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 93%
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 93%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic on coverage of RMNH interventions in Ethiopia 93%
- A Development and Implementation of a Preconception Counseling Program for Black Women and Men in the Southeastern United States: A Pilot Protocol 93%
- SDG5 ‘Gender Equality’ and the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid assessment of health system responses in selected upper-middle and high-income countries 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.