Back

Endoleak Prediction After EVAR: A Point Cloud Neural Network Framework Enhanced by Computational Fluid Dynamics and Multi-Features

Peng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, W.; Zou, L.; Dong, Z.; Jiang, J.; He, W.

2026-01-30 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.27.26345009 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEndovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is effective in preventing rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but endoleak remains a serious postoperative complication. Accurate prediction of endoleak risk is a significant clinical challenge. PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the value of a Point Cloud Neural Network (PCNN) in predicting endoleaks after EVAR by integrating multimodal features. Materials and MethodsWe collected follow-up data from 381 AAA patients. Radiomic characteristics of the procedural intraluminal thrombus and morphological parameters were extracted following medical image segmentation and 3D reconstruction. Hemodynamic parameters, including time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT), were obtained through a semi-automated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) workflow. Six traditional machine learning models and four PCNN architectures were developed with progressively added feature sets: 1) medical history and morphology (H+M); 2) H+M+R; 3) H+M+CFD; and 4) all features combined (H+M+R+CFD). ResultsTraditional ML models showed limited performance (AUC range: 0.55-0.77). In contrast, PCNN models demonstrated substantially improved predictive capability. The baseline PCNN (H+M) achieved an AUC of 0.81. The RA-PCNN model incorporating radiomic features showed a 6.58% improvement (AUC=0.86). The CFD-PCNN model with hemodynamic parameters exhibited a 13.0% increase (AUC=0.91), with superior F1-score (0.78) and recall (0.88). The multimodal RA-CFD-PCNN model performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.93, accuracy of 0.90, and F1-score of 0.83. ConclusionThis study establishes a PCNN-based framework for endoleak prediction that significantly outperforms traditional machine learning methods, providing an effective approach for assessing endoleaks in AAA patients. Summary statementThis study developed a PCNN-based framework integrating clinical, morphologic al, radiomic, and hemodynamic features from 381 AAA patients to predict endoleaks after EVAR. Results demonstrated superior performance over traditional ML, with hemodynamic parameters providing a major performance boost, highlighting the value of physiological and biomechanical feature integration for vascular disease prediction. Key ResultsThe multimodal PCNN model integrating all features achieved an AUC of 0.93, significantly outperforming traditional machine learning models (AUCs 0.55-0.77). Incorporating hemodynamic parameters provided the greatest performance increase, with the CFD-PCNN models AUC increasing by 13.0% to 0.91 compared to the baseline PCNN (AUC=0.81). The model combining radiomics and hemodynamics (RA-CFD-PCNN) achieved the highest F1-score of 0.83 and AUC of 0.93, demonstrating robust predictive accuracy.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
10
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
11
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
12
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%