Back

Endoleak Prediction After EVAR: A Point Cloud Neural Network Framework Enhanced by Computational Fluid Dynamics and Multi-Features

Peng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, W.; Zou, L.; Dong, Z.; Jiang, J.; He, W.

2026-01-30 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.27.26345009
Show abstract

BackgroundEndovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is effective in preventing rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but endoleak remains a serious postoperative complication. Accurate prediction of endoleak risk is a significant clinical challenge. PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the value of a Point Cloud Neural Network (PCNN) in predicting endoleaks after EVAR by integrating multimodal features. Materials and MethodsWe collected follow-up data from 381 AAA patients. Radiomic characteristics of the procedural intraluminal thrombus and morphological parameters were extracted following medical image segmentation and 3D reconstruction. Hemodynamic parameters, including time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT), were obtained through a semi-automated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) workflow. Six traditional machine learning models and four PCNN architectures were developed with progressively added feature sets: 1) medical history and morphology (H+M); 2) H+M+R; 3) H+M+CFD; and 4) all features combined (H+M+R+CFD). ResultsTraditional ML models showed limited performance (AUC range: 0.55-0.77). In contrast, PCNN models demonstrated substantially improved predictive capability. The baseline PCNN (H+M) achieved an AUC of 0.81. The RA-PCNN model incorporating radiomic features showed a 6.58% improvement (AUC=0.86). The CFD-PCNN model with hemodynamic parameters exhibited a 13.0% increase (AUC=0.91), with superior F1-score (0.78) and recall (0.88). The multimodal RA-CFD-PCNN model performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.93, accuracy of 0.90, and F1-score of 0.83. ConclusionThis study establishes a PCNN-based framework for endoleak prediction that significantly outperforms traditional machine learning methods, providing an effective approach for assessing endoleaks in AAA patients. Summary statementThis study developed a PCNN-based framework integrating clinical, morphologic al, radiomic, and hemodynamic features from 381 AAA patients to predict endoleaks after EVAR. Results demonstrated superior performance over traditional ML, with hemodynamic parameters providing a major performance boost, highlighting the value of physiological and biomechanical feature integration for vascular disease prediction. Key ResultsThe multimodal PCNN model integrating all features achieved an AUC of 0.93, significantly outperforming traditional machine learning models (AUCs 0.55-0.77). Incorporating hemodynamic parameters provided the greatest performance increase, with the CFD-PCNN models AUC increasing by 13.0% to 0.91 compared to the baseline PCNN (AUC=0.81). The model combining radiomics and hemodynamics (RA-CFD-PCNN) achieved the highest F1-score of 0.83 and AUC of 0.93, demonstrating robust predictive accuracy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 3%
9.9%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 17%
9.9%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 1%
9.9%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 0.5%
7.4%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 63%
6.2%
6
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
4.6%
7
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 5%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 1.0%
2.7%
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
2.3%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
12
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 32%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 8%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 13%
1.3%
23
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
24
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
28
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
29
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 6%
0.7%