Back

External validation of self-supervised transfer learning for noninvasive molecular subtyping of pediatric low-grade glioma using T2-weighted MRI

Yoo, J. J.; Tak, D.; Namdar, K.; Wagner, M. W.; Liu, A.; Tabori, U.; Hawkins, C.; Ertl-Wagner, B. B.; Kann, B. H.; Khalvati, F.

2026-01-30 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.01.27.26344883 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo externally evaluate three binary classification models designed to differentiate the molecular subtype of pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) between BRAF Fusion, BRAF Mutation, and Wild Type on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging using self-supervised transfer learning, which enables effective performance in a low data setting. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study evaluates pLGG molecular subtyping models, pre-trained using data collected at Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Bostons Childrens Hospital, on two datasets from the Hospital for Sick Children, one consisting of patients identified from the electronic health record between January 2000 to December 2018 (n=336) and another consisting of patients identified from the electronic health record between January 2019 to April 2023 (n=87). These datasets consist of T2-weighted MRI with pLGG and corresponding genetic marker identifications, labelled as BRAF Fusion, BRAF Mutation, or Wild Type. The datasets included manually annotated ground-truth segmentations that were used in the classification pipeline during evaluation. The models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). To acquire a per-class probabilities across all three considered molecular subtypes, we used the output probabilities from each binary model as logits input to a Softmax function. These probabilities were used to determine the AUC of the models on each evaluated dataset. ResultsThe models performed achieved a macro-average AUC of 0.7671 on the newer dataset from the Hospital for Sick Children but achieved a lower macro-average AUC of 0.6463 on the older dataset from the Hospital for Sick Children. ConclusionsThe evaluated pLGG molecular subtyping models have the potential for effective generalization but may require further fine-tuning for consistent performance across varying datasets.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.5%
3
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
7
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
8
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
15
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%