Cognitive bias modification for emotional facial expressions modifies neural mechanisms in individuals taking antidepressant medication: a Randomised Controlled Trial
Crisp, C. M.; Fallon, S. J.; Burns, A.; Kuruoglu, R.; Ferrar, J.; Wiles, N.; Kessler, D.; Munafo, M. R.; Penton-Voak, I. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundAntidepressants exert their therapeutic effects through ameliorating negative emotional biases that underpin depression. However, therapeutic gains may depend upon restructuring how emotional information is processed. This can be achieved through Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM), a technique for positively shifting recognition of emotional facial expressions. Here, we examined how CBM modifies emotional processing circuits in individuals with depression who were taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). MethodsA double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial was conducted in 84 participants with depression who had recently started SSRI medication. Participants received five sessions of active or sham CBM over one week before fMRI scanning where they viewed emotional faces (happy, fearful, sad). ResultsAcross all emotional expressions, greater Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signal was observed in the inferior occipital gyrus for the active compared to sham CBM. Emotional-specific effects were observed in the medial Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC), with reduced BOLD signal in the active (compared to sham) group for viewing happy vs. fearful faces. Changes in BOLD signal were also associated with individual differences in response to CBM. Enhanced functional connectivity between mPFC and right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (rDLPFC) predicted improvement in depressive symptoms four weeks later. ConclusionsThese results indicate that CBM modifies the neural circuits involved in emotion processing in people with depression currently taking antidepressants. Converting these changes in emotional perception to improved depressive symptoms was related to changing mPFC-rDLPFC connectivity. Future trials are needed to test CBMs clinical utility as a simple, affordable and accessible adjunct therapy for depression.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional recognition training modifies neural response to emotional faces but does not improve mood in healthy volunteers with high levels of depressive symptoms 97%
- Higher amplitudes of visual networks are associated with trait but not state- depression. 96%
- Graded changes in local functional connectivity of the brain in young people with depression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disrupted Limbic-Prefrontal Effective Connectivity in Response to Fearful Faces in Lifetime Depression 98%
- Neuroimaging Correlates of Emotional Response-Inhibition Discriminate Between Young Depressed Adults With and Without Sub-threshold Bipolar Symptoms 96%
- Increased low-frequency brain responses to music after psilocybin therapy for depression 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coping under stress: Prefrontal control predicts stress burden during the COVID-19 crisis 95%
- Psilocybin-induced changes in brain network integrity and segregation correlate with plasma psilocin level and psychedelic experience 93%
- Oxytocin increases the pleasantness of affective touch and orbitofrontal cortex activity independent of valence 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Importance of test-retest reliability for promoting fMRI based screening and intervention in major depressive disorder 96%
- A Brain Model of Altered Self-Appraisal in Social Anxiety Disorder 95%
- The Influence of Phenotyping Method on Structural Neuroimaging Associations with Depression in UK Biobank 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.