Back

Heparinized Elastomeric Nanofibrillar Grafts: A Novel Approach for Mechanically Tunable, Cell-Supportive, and Thromboresistant Vascular Substitutes

Zermeno, E. C.; Kapitan, J. M.; Sandquist, A. D.; Reke, A.; Kumar Paul, A.; MacTaggart, J. N.; Morin, S. A.; Maleckis, K.

2026-01-27 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.26.701857 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The clinical success of vascular grafts relies on three main prerequisites: artery-tuned mechanics, cell-supportive microstructure, and a thromboresistant interface. Most current solutions address only a subset of this triad and equate mechanical matching with compliance alone, which can lead to disturbed hemodynamics, maladaptive mechanobiology, and adverse graft-host biochemical interactions that frequently culminate in clinical complications and graft failure. This study presents polyurethane-based heparin-functionalized elastomeric nanofibrillar grafts (H-ENGs) that integrate all three prerequisites while allowing multi-parameter mechanical mimicry. To address the principal failure mode of early thrombosis, a small fraction of polyethyleneimine (PEI) is added to the ENG electrospinning solution to form P-ENGs, enabling one-step covalent heparin conjugation to form H-ENGs. The decoupled design of the ENG platform preserves the biomimetic microstructure and mechanics following PEI incorporation and heparinization, enabling adaptable, indication-specific optimization. In vitro, H-ENGs exhibit good cytocompatibility with minimal hemolysis, platelet adhesion, and whole blood clotting. Pilot porcine abdominal aorta interposition studies demonstrate feasibility: H-ENGs exhibit favorable surgical handling, intact suture-line integrity, and anastomotic hemostasis under dynamic flow, and retain artery-tuned mechanics and surface heparin at two weeks. While further testing is warranted, these results indicate that H-ENGs satisfy the three prerequisites for vascular graft clinical success. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=68 SRC="FIGDIR/small/701857v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (23K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e09f2aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f1b5baorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d1fba6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e066ca_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.3%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.4%
4
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
5
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
6
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
8
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
9
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
18
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
20
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%