Back

Parenting with Hope program among bereaved families in Colombia: A pre-post and quasi-experimental evaluation.

Villaveces, A.; Tucker, S.; Arroyo, S.; Blanco, P. J.; Colon, M.; Prias, H. E.; Pecserke, S.; Baldonado, N.; Flaxman, S.; Hillis, S. D.; Ratmann, O.

2026-01-28 public and global health
10.64898/2026.01.26.26344879 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn Colombia, internal violence, displacement, COVID-19, suicide, and climate crises threaten the survival of younger adults, many of whom are parents. Such premature mortality increases orphanhood risks. Evidence-based psychosocial support for surviving caregivers has potential to mitigate adverse impacts of orphanhood for bereaved children in crisis settings. Here, we adapted the Hope Group program from war-affected Ukraine to post-COVID-19 Colombia Parenting with Hope, and evaluated the effectiveness of psychosocial and parenting support delivered via home visits on improvements in caregiver mental health, violence against children, parenting practices, and child behavioral issues. MethodsParticipants (n=220) included surviving caregivers co-residing with children experiencing death of a parent or caregiver in the previous 12-36 months. Next-of-kin caregivers were identified through vital statistics data, death certificate annexes, radio/social media, schools, COVID-19 laboratories, and referrals. We used pre-post and quasi-experimental approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of Parenting with Hope. For both analysis types, we constructed Bayesian models to estimate mean change and percent change following completion of the 8-session program. ResultsBoth pre-post and quasi-experimental findings showed significant improvements across all mental health, violence prevention, parenting, and child outcomes. Pre-post results showed caregiver depression/anxiety ratings decreased by 91.2% (95% posterior credible interval (CrI) - 93.7, -87.6), and hopefulness increased by 43.8% (95% CrI 34.5, 54.8) and self-care, by 139.5% (95% CrI 107.5, 178.1). Each component measure of parenting practises (nonviolent discipline, positive parenting, parental monitoring, and parental involvement) improved significantly. By endline, violence against children had decreased by 63.9% (95% CrI -71.1, -54.4), and child externalizing and internalizing behaviors, by 74.4% (95% CrI, -78.0%, -70.3%). Pre-post and quasi-experimental findings showed equivalence. ConclusionThis study generalizes evidence for effectiveness of Parenting with Hope in crisis settings to surviving Colombian caregivers, on improved mental health, parenting practices, and reduced violence against children and child behavioral issues. Article Summary Parenting with Hope for families in crisis settings significantly improved mental health and parenting strategies in post-COVID-19 Colombia, generalizing effectiveness previously measured in war-affected Ukraine. Whats Known on This SubjectCaregiver death harms children long-term. Colombia experiences both community violence affecting caregivers and substantial COVID-19-related parental death burden. A Ukrainian program improved caregiver mental health, parenting, and reduced child violence, offering a model for Colombias prevention efforts. What This Study AddsWe report pre-post evidence of the Parenting with Hopes effectiveness in Colombian families experiencing bereavement. Adapted from Ukraine Hope Groups, the intervention shows consistent benefits and is a promising, transferable and scalable strategy to prevent violence against children in communities globally.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
4
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
8
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%