Back

Accurate Stride Length Prediction from Proximal IMU Sensors Using a Compact Linear Model

Gibbons, R.; Yee, J.; Webster, R.; Wajda, D.

2026-01-27 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.01.26.26344854 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAccurate stride length measurement is essential for assessing functional mobility, yet gold-standard methods remain confined to laboratory settings. This study aimed to develop and validate a computationally efficient, interpretable linear model for predicting stride length using thigh- and shank-mounted inertial measurement units integrated into a wearable neuromodulation sleeve. MethodsData from the sleeve were collected from 29 healthy adults performing walking bouts at four self-selected speeds. Participants traversed a pressure-sensitive gait mat, providing gold standard labels. A linear regression model was developed from engineered features from the kinematics data streams and validated against a held-out test set (n = 6) using leaveone-participant-out cross-validation. ResultsThe final linear model utilized five predictors: participant height, shank range of motion (ROM), thigh ROM, and thigh swing duration metrics. It achieved high predictive accuracy with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 5.98 cm, a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 4.53%, and an R2 of 0.89. The model significantly outperformed naive baseline models (p < 0.05) and performed similarly to more complex non-linear architectures, such as neural networks and random forests. Notably, 88.4% of strides were predicted within 10% of the ground truth. ConclusionA parsimonious linear model leveraging proximal limb kinematics provides accurate and biomechanically interpretable stride length estimation. Low computational demand makes it suitable for real-time, ondevice gait monitoring in wearable assistive technologies, facilitating clinical assessments in real-world environments.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.