Opportunistic Upper Endoscopy at the Time of Screening Colonoscopy: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Patient Perspectives
In, H.; De la Torre-Cisneros, K.; Brijesh, R.; Myrthil-Harder, P.; Adams, A.; Dalal, I.; Patel, A.; Kesavarapu, K.; Zhou, Z.; Jhala, N.; Handorf, E.; Kinney, A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesGastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States (U.S.), yet no routine screening strategy exists. Opportunistic upper endoscopy (EGD) performed during screening colonoscopy (EGD-SC) may provide a practical early detection approach. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, patient perspectives, and diagnostic yield of EGD-SC. MethodsThis single-center, open-label, single-arm prospective trial enrolled adults aged 45-80 years scheduled for colonoscopy without prior EGD in the past five years. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment, added procedural time, and safety. Acceptability, patient beliefs, motivators, barriers, and satisfaction were assessed using pre- and post-procedure surveys. Gastric biopsies evaluated for precancerous lesions. ResultsOf individuals contacted, 51.6% expressed interest and 26.6% enrolled (n=50; median age 56; 48% male; 68% high-risk). Median added time was 17 minutes (range 9-26), with no complications. All participants rated EGD-SC as satisfactory (100%) and 90% as acceptable; most preferred the combined procedure (97.5%) and would recommend it to family or friends (92.5%). Knowledge gaps were common: nearly half lacked awareness of GC risk factors; although 72% viewed screening as beneficial, only 23.3% perceived GC as severe, and none considered themselves highly susceptible. EGD found H. pylori infection (32%), atrophic gastritis (14%), and intestinal metaplasia (12%), with higher prevalence among high-risk participants. ConclusionsEGD-SC is feasible, safe, and highly acceptable, with strong patient endorsement and meaningful detection of GC precursor lesions. These findings support risk-stratified EGD-SC as a promising and pragmatic strategy for GC prevention and early detection in the U.S.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.