Back

Opportunistic Upper Endoscopy at the Time of Screening Colonoscopy: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Patient Perspectives

In, H.; De la Torre-Cisneros, K.; Brijesh, R.; Myrthil-Harder, P.; Adams, A.; Dalal, I.; Patel, A.; Kesavarapu, K.; Zhou, Z.; Jhala, N.; Handorf, E.; Kinney, A.

2026-01-27 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.01.26.26344849 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesGastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States (U.S.), yet no routine screening strategy exists. Opportunistic upper endoscopy (EGD) performed during screening colonoscopy (EGD-SC) may provide a practical early detection approach. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, patient perspectives, and diagnostic yield of EGD-SC. MethodsThis single-center, open-label, single-arm prospective trial enrolled adults aged 45-80 years scheduled for colonoscopy without prior EGD in the past five years. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment, added procedural time, and safety. Acceptability, patient beliefs, motivators, barriers, and satisfaction were assessed using pre- and post-procedure surveys. Gastric biopsies evaluated for precancerous lesions. ResultsOf individuals contacted, 51.6% expressed interest and 26.6% enrolled (n=50; median age 56; 48% male; 68% high-risk). Median added time was 17 minutes (range 9-26), with no complications. All participants rated EGD-SC as satisfactory (100%) and 90% as acceptable; most preferred the combined procedure (97.5%) and would recommend it to family or friends (92.5%). Knowledge gaps were common: nearly half lacked awareness of GC risk factors; although 72% viewed screening as beneficial, only 23.3% perceived GC as severe, and none considered themselves highly susceptible. EGD found H. pylori infection (32%), atrophic gastritis (14%), and intestinal metaplasia (12%), with higher prevalence among high-risk participants. ConclusionsEGD-SC is feasible, safe, and highly acceptable, with strong patient endorsement and meaningful detection of GC precursor lesions. These findings support risk-stratified EGD-SC as a promising and pragmatic strategy for GC prevention and early detection in the U.S.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.3%
2
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
5
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
7
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
14
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
21
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%