Opportunistic Upper Endoscopy at the Time of Screening Colonoscopy: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Patient Perspectives
In, H.; De la Torre-Cisneros, K.; Brijesh, R.; Myrthil-Harder, P.; Adams, A.; Dalal, I.; Patel, A.; Kesavarapu, K.; Zhou, Z.; Jhala, N.; Handorf, E.; Kinney, A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesGastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States (U.S.), yet no routine screening strategy exists. Opportunistic upper endoscopy (EGD) performed during screening colonoscopy (EGD-SC) may provide a practical early detection approach. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, patient perspectives, and diagnostic yield of EGD-SC. MethodsThis single-center, open-label, single-arm prospective trial enrolled adults aged 45-80 years scheduled for colonoscopy without prior EGD in the past five years. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment, added procedural time, and safety. Acceptability, patient beliefs, motivators, barriers, and satisfaction were assessed using pre- and post-procedure surveys. Gastric biopsies evaluated for precancerous lesions. ResultsOf individuals contacted, 51.6% expressed interest and 26.6% enrolled (n=50; median age 56; 48% male; 68% high-risk). Median added time was 17 minutes (range 9-26), with no complications. All participants rated EGD-SC as satisfactory (100%) and 90% as acceptable; most preferred the combined procedure (97.5%) and would recommend it to family or friends (92.5%). Knowledge gaps were common: nearly half lacked awareness of GC risk factors; although 72% viewed screening as beneficial, only 23.3% perceived GC as severe, and none considered themselves highly susceptible. EGD found H. pylori infection (32%), atrophic gastritis (14%), and intestinal metaplasia (12%), with higher prevalence among high-risk participants. ConclusionsEGD-SC is feasible, safe, and highly acceptable, with strong patient endorsement and meaningful detection of GC precursor lesions. These findings support risk-stratified EGD-SC as a promising and pragmatic strategy for GC prevention and early detection in the U.S.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 96%
- Nonendoscopic Detection Of Barrett’S Esophagus In Patients Without Gerd Symptoms 94%
- Strong reduction of distal colorectal cancer incidence and mortality but no reduction of proximal colon cancer after screening colonoscopy: prospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-centre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web-tool 95%
- Sphincterotomy for Biliary Sphincter of Oddi Disorder and idiopathic Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis: THE RESPOND LONGITUDINAL COHORT 93%
- Barrett's esophagus is the precursor of all esophageal adenocarcinomas 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and Safety of Tradipitant in Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. 91%
- Clonal transitions and phenotypic evolution in Barrett esophagus 91%
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Treatment Response using Diagnostic Histopathology 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Colorectal cancer in patients with single versus double positive faecal immunochemical test results: A retrospective cohort study 92%
- Oral aspirin for preventing colorectal adenoma recurrence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 91%
- Effects of a spore-forming probiotic blend on bowel habits and physical well-being in adults with functional constipation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A standardized system and App for continuous patient symptom logging in gastroduodenal disorders: design, implementation, and validation 93%
- Distinct subgroups in gastroparesis defined by simultaneous body surface gastric mapping and gastric emptying breath testing 92%
- Predicting symptomatic response to prokinetic treatment using Gastric Alimetry 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.