Student-run Clinic Participation and Likelihood of Practicing Primary Care: A Meta-Analysis
Peoples, N.; Xiong, S.; Nguyen, S.; Brock, D.; Clark, D.
Show abstract
ImportanceThe United States is facing a projected shortage of 40,000 primary care physicians by 2034. Student-run clinics (SRCs) are widely regarded as service-learning environments that may encourage students to enter a primary care specialty, but prior studies have yielded conflicting results and are limited to non-generalizable, single site analyses. ObjectiveTo compare likelihood of practice in a primary care specialty between students who did and did not participate in an SRC via pooled meta-analysis of U.S.-based studies. Study SelectionStudies were first identified through a comprehensive library of U.S.-based SRC literature. The inclusion criteria were publications on SRCs in the United States with MD/DO students, from all time until March 1, 2024. Exclusion criteria were: full text not available; published abstract/textbook/dissertation/thesis; not in English. Two authors independently screened the database for publications on SRC participation and practice in primary care specialties. To identify relevant literature after March 1, 2024, the authors performed iterative snowball sampling of the bibliographies of included studies and their Google Scholar "cited by" lists until saturation. Finally, we included original data from the single largest study on this topic. Data Extraction and SynthesisWe evaluated study quality using the NIH Study Quality Appraisal Tool. We used a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the relative likelihood (risk ratio) of pursuing a primary care specialty among SRC volunteers versus non-volunteers. We used a funnel plot and sensitivity analysis to assess for bias. ResultsSeven studies met inclusion criteria with a cumulative sample size of 7,468 students. SRC volunteers pursued primary care at 102% to 160% the rate of non-volunteers. The pooled risk ratio was 1.25 (95% CI: 1.09-1.44). Funnel plot and multiple sensitivity analyses did not suggest publication bias or undue influence from included studies. Conclusions and RelevanceSRC participation is associated with a statistically-significant 25% increased likelihood of practicing in a primary care specialty. These findings may inform national and institutional strategies to support service-learning and address the national primary care workforce shortage. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs participation in a student-run clinic during medical school associated with increased likelihood of practicing in a primary care specialty? FindingsDespite conflicting results in the literature among small and single-site studies, in this meta-analysis of 7,468 medical students, participation in a student-run clinic was associated with a statistically significant 25% increased likelihood of practicing in a primary care specialty. MeaningStudent-run clinics may be a potential strategy for strengthening the pipeline into primary care and reducing the projected shortage of 40,000 primary care physicians.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Making the Match or Breaking it? Values, Perceptions, and Obstacles of Trainees Applying into Physician-Scientist Training Programs 94%
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 94%
- Evaluating the inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer-related content in graduate medical education: a national survey of program directors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 93%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 92%
- Financial Conflicts of Interest among U.S. Physician Authors of 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 93%
- A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal 92%
- Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers' confidential comments to editors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Open Science Practices Among Authors Published in Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An International, Cross-Sectional Survey 90%
- Effect of Tai Ji and/or Qigong on Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease A protocol for meta-analysis and systematic review 89%
- Risk Factor Stratification for Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Database Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 91%
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 90%
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.