Back

RLBWT-Based LCP Computation in Compressed Space for Terabase-Scale Pangenome Analysis

Sanaullah, A.; Brown, N. K.; Shakya, P.; Deegutla, A.; Naseri, A.; Langmead, B.; Zhi, D.; Zhang, S.

2026-01-25 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.01.23.701410 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lossless full text indexes are utilized in a myriad of applications in bioinformatics. The continuously decreasing cost of generating biological data has resulted in the need to build full text indexes on biological datasets of increasing size. Many compressed full text indexes have been developed to address this problem. In particular, run-length Burrows-Wheeler transform (RLBWT) based compressed full text indexes have seen wide development and adoption. However, the construction of these RLBWT-based compressed full text indexes is still computationally expensive, sometimes prohibitively so, even for current dataset sizes. Therefore, we present algorithms for the construction of RLBWT-based compressed full text indexes and their supporting data structures in compressed space. The algorithms have a space complexity of O(r) words and run in O(n) time for repetitive datasets, where r is the number of runs in the BWT, n is the length of the text, and repetitive datasets implies the average run length is at least log n. We provide the first algorithm to compute LCP-related information for repetitive datasets in optimal time and O(r) space, greatly reducing memory requirements. The key idea behind this algorithm is the utilization of r samples of the inverse suffix array at regular intervals. For example, on the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium Release 2 dataset, this reduces peak memory from 2,135 GiB to 170 GiB (12.6x reduction) compared to the previous best method (pfp-thresholds). AvailabilityThe implementation is available at https://github.com/ucfcbb/TeraTools. Supplementary InformationSupplementary Material is available online at bioRxiv.

Published in Bioinformatics (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.